|
 | | Re: Debunk this?
|
| (...) I agree that legally Israel does exist and that it is here to stay. I wish they would respect human rights a little more, stop murdering people, respect UN resolutions, hand back what is does not belong top them, get rid of their nuclear (...) (23 years ago, 29-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
rights
(score: 0.429)
|
|
| | Re: What happened?
|
| (...) Right, but maybe there are other fields than IT. I just picked that because lots of us are familiar with it. If you can speak clearly, you can work as a bellboy. You can wait tables. You can assemble widgets in a plant and make more than (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.428)
|
|
| | Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
| Simon & All; Based on the conversations I have read regarding these issues (health care, right of, etc.), and Larry's views (Libertarian), I think a lot of you are missing Larry's point as well as my own. If you compare what the founding Fathers (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.428)
|
|
| | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
| Larry, Like I said, the fetal tissue research I did not like. I think that is a BIG one. You might be surprised, Larry, but here is my views on what you said: 1) According to the Bible, Homosexuality is a sin and is detestable to God. (I can verse (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.428)
|
|
| | Re: What happened?
|
| (...) So I suppose that you're going to say that National Socialism wasn't fascism because it said it wasn't? I'd say the lot of them are close enough, as their regimes had the requisite proportion of trampled rights and jackbooted thugs, (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.428)
|
|
| | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
| (...) I'll answer for him, leaving it open for him to answer for himself. The LP is religion neutral to the extent that it recognises that individual belief systems vary and should be respected. But it has some thoughts on behaviours that may be (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.428)
|
|
| | Re: Special Identification for Arab Americans?
|
| (...) While I agree in general, I don't think thats what I was asking. My main worry is that the Arab/Islamic nations outside of Afganistan will see this as meddling in another Islamic nations business and trying to push our ways on them. I could (...) (23 years ago, 26-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.428)
|
|
| | Re: Special Identification for Arab Americans?
|
| (...) That *is* kind of scary. It should serve as an indication of how fundamental the crisis of such thinking is, that groups from the far-right *and* the far-left are willing to work together with a broad spectrum of groups in between to oppose (...) (23 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.428)
|
|
| | Re: Special Identification for Arab Americans?
|
| (...) Holy Toledo. I would have expected a peak of maybe 30% for the ID question (still frightening). That poll was done on 14-15 sep, I really hope the percentage has dropped (a lot) in the last week and a bit. Man. That means half the people (...) (23 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.428)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.428)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.428)
|
|
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
| Alas, how will I continue my 'debate' with Lar? Thanks Janey and Ross for all your efforts. I shall now doubly cherish my engraved brick. Peace and passing, Professor Whateverly (URL) (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.428)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.427)
|
|
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
| (...) <snip the unbelievable news> Thanks to Mistress Janey and Ross for all of their effort. Can we now have a JLUG newsgroup on LUGNET? Please? The conspiracy must live on. Where else am I going to post all of those jokes? Jude (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.427)
|
|
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
| (...) Thanks for registering and all, guys. However, this is just a sample, and I'm not sure I'm the one to be administering or hosting a forum. I really just wanted to prove to Allister how quick and easy it was to set up a forum. Perhaps more (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.427)
|
|
| | Re: The big lie
|
| (...) Correct. I don't want civil rights lessened or destroyed across the board. (...) I suspect you are reading things correctly, unfortunately. That doesn't make what happens "right" though, as I've said before, just because a majority votes (or (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.427)
|
|
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote: snip (...) Janey, Thank you for all the effort you and ross put into JLUG. It will be missed. You ran a fine site, and stuck to your values. thank you. Chris (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.427)
|
|
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
| I forgot to add Thank you Janey, and thank you Rosco, for all the work you put in to give us a sand pit in the sun. If something else eventually gets off the ground, I hope you 2 and all the other who helped make it a grand place come back into the (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.427)
|
|
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote: snip (...) As an intermittent lurker and appreciator of all things JLug, this is sad news :( I do feel that JLug served a very niche market for the LEGO enthusiast--one which was needed and (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.427)
|
|
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
| (...) Seems to me its the one place on Lugnet that all Journeymen could be guaranteed to read sooner or later. Very sad tidings gang. But the fact that its gone does not diminish how much I loved it, which was a lot. Thanks. Oh, and just once more, (...) (17 years ago, 21-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.427)
|
