To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9349
9348  |  9350
Subject: 
Re: In the interest of full disclosure...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 10 Feb 2001 14:42:59 GMT
Viewed: 
807 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Culberson writes:
> I realise the limits of taking an analogy too far...but since you
> already did it.....what you've just said is still intelligent design.
> What are the chances of a moustrap forming if you put all the parts into
> a box and shake it - that's not having intellignet design.
> 
> snippo
> 
> I love this example.  I see you conveniently left out "the chef
> (baker?)" in your list.  Without any "thing that is intelligent" to
> create the cake, you'll never have a cake....even if you wait for 4.5
> billion years.  That scaffolding you list is useless without somebody to
> use it!

The breaking point with both analogies is that they refer to human-invented
artefacts (leading to the spurious conclusion that the universe is
_necessarily_ a God-invented artefact). Re the scaffolding, I can give an
example from embryology. At one stage of development the fingers of a foetus
have connective webbing, which later disappears. There's no intervention
from any "divine architect" to specifically remove that webbing, its growth
and disappearance is a totally natural process. The webbing facilitates the
development of our fingers, yet can scarcely be discerned in a normal fully
formed hand. In other words, just because scaffolding is no longer present,
doesn't mean that it wasn't there before, and a complex developed structure
doesn't require a more complex precursor.

Instead of pushing the tiresome sophistry of Dr Dino back and forth, I'd
appreciate a more interesting discussion. I hope a reply to my post
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=9082 would be a good place to start.

--DaveL



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: In the interest of full disclosure...
 
(...) I realise the limits of taking an analogy too far...but since you already did it.....what you've just said is still intelligent design. What are the chances of a moustrap forming if you put all the parts into a box and shake it - that's not (...) (26 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

25 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR