Subject:
|
Re: In the interest of full disclosure...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 18:43:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
158 times
|
| |
|
|
Jon Kozan wrote:
> I can only hope that you take this as an indicator that the major scientific
> community does recognize the futility of macro-evolution explanation for how
> life cameinto existance and 'progressed'.
The article stated:
"What distinguishes intelligent design from creationism is that it has won the
backing of a minority of scientists"
To my way of interpreting things "a minority of scientists" does not imply "the
major scientific
community". Pedants please also note that the context of the statement does not
imply that creationists are in a majority in scientific circles; it implies that
creationism has even less backing than "intelligent design".
Secondly, why do your lot perpetually bang this drum about evolution being used
as an explanation for how life came into existence? It has frequently been
brought to your attention that proponents of evolution do not actually claim this
at all, straight from the horses mouth as it were.
Jennifer Clark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: In the interest of full disclosure...
|
| (...) I can only hope that you take this as an indicator that the major scientific community does recognize the futility of macro-evolution explanation for how life cameinto existance and 'progressed'. The intelligence often pointed to is often (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
