Subject:
|
Re: In the interest of full disclosure...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 10 Feb 2001 01:55:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
199 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave Low wrote:
> Maybe Chris Tracey (or someone else) can explain this a bit better, but I think
> it's important to point out the main flaw in "intelligent design". To take
> Behe's mousetrap analogy: it's true that half a mousetrap isn't much of a
> mousetrap. But there's plenty of other useful things you can do with a piece of
> board, or a spring, or a sliver of metal. And if you juggle them around for long
> enough, picking those arrangements that do something vaguely interesting, you
> could well end up with a mouse trap.
This is a good start. I have some additions to this but I'm late for an
event I have to go to. I'll send my comments ASAP.
-chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: In the interest of full disclosure...
|
| (...) Maybe Chris Tracey (or someone else) can explain this a bit better, but I think it's important to point out the main flaw in "intelligent design". To take Behe's mousetrap analogy: it's true that half a mousetrap isn't much of a mousetrap. But (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
