To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9325
9324  |  9326
Subject: 
Re: In the interest of full disclosure...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:18:33 GMT
Viewed: 
131 times
  
The author of this article also reveals science illiteracy at best and bias at
worst in describing evolution as positing a "random" force at work in shaping
variations. Darwin's theory of descent with modification postulated the
principle of natural selection by analogy with the selection occurring in
domesticated animals, the ability to live and breed and have descendants do the
same. In no way may it be considered that whether an organism succeeds through
natural selection is a random affair, as the advantages and disadvantages of
any particular organism are tested through the requirement for survival and
reproduction. It should not surprise, then, that Dr. Behe found this interview
to be congenial.

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
My views about creationism should at this point be fairly well established,
but I came across this piece in the local paper today.

http://www.postgazette.com/magazine/20010208behe6.asp

The Pittsburgh Post Gazette isn't exactly a rigorous scientific journal, so
the inclusion of this article shouldn't be taken to equal legitimacy.  In
addition, Dr. Michael Behe's theory of intelligent design does nothing to
explain where the intelligent designer came from, and he also seems
uninterested in the theory of punctuated equilibrium, among others, since
his comments come across as a refutation of basic Darwinian evolution rather
than current theory.

    Dave!



Message is in Reply To:
  In the interest of full disclosure...
 
My views about creationism should at this point be fairly well established, but I came across this piece in the local paper today. (URL) Pittsburgh Post Gazette isn't exactly a rigorous scientific journal, so the inclusion of this article shouldn't (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

25 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR