Subject:
|
Re: The Right To Exploit (WAS: Concerns regarding Brick-o-Lizer User Agreement)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 21:24:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
817 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Todd Lehman wrote:
> The question of circumventing the ambiguities in the LMBOLUA[1] is an
> amoral issue (not moral, and not immoral, but amoral, meaning not in the realm
> of morality or immorality) and if you find an obvious loophole in an agreement
> that you can use to your advantage without breaking the agreement, who's to
> say there is a problem anywhere but within the agreement itself?
Especially when the "spirit" of the LMBOLUA is part of the ambiguity. We
don't know what TLC is trying to accomplish via the terms they laid out.
All we know is they put together a number of somewhat bizarre legalish
terms.
Now, if we had a pretty good idea of the *purpose* of the terms (beyond
protecting TLC), we could make a judgement on whether specific behavior is
exploiting or Exploiting.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
