Subject:
|
Re: Distaste for Jar-Jar (was: The Censors have won.)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 4 Nov 2000 21:35:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
380 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
>
> ...I don't think it's being humor
> impaired to question the value of something which shows intolerance. I'll even
> admit that when I read the story, I laughed at Jar-Jar's beating (though not
> nearly so much as the rest of the story). When Larry posted on the subject, I
> thought about it, and found that I was wrong to laugh at it. It isn't really
> funny. I don't think it's satire either. I think there would be far more
> effective ways of expressing satire. I agree, Jar-Jar was an almost nauseating
> character.
Here's an example (remember this one?) in which the creator (IMO) found a far
more effective way to express his feelings about Jar Jar. I thought this was
hilarious and the best use for Jar Jar heads I've ever seen.
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/brian_h_nielsen/Halloween/Hw2.htm
It's in the third frame. To view the whole story just change the Hw2.htm to
Hw1.htm when you get there. As for the treatment of Timmy, that was another
whole debate, so I won't go into that. But note how Brian has a warning before
you get to the page where heinous acts occur....
Maggie C.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
