To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6891
6890  |  6892
Subject: 
Re: Distaste for Jar-Jar (was: The Censors have won.)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.starwars
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 4 Nov 2000 20:27:38 GMT
Viewed: 
1888 times
  
Sorry should have been clipped to ot.debate

"Rob Doucette" <rob.doucette@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:G3Ios1.G43@lugnet.com...
> "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
> news:G3IM77.9yF@lugnet.com...
> > But I actually *like* Elmo even though I detest Barney.  How do you • explain
> > that?
> 
> The Sesame Street magazine had an article on the child psych design of
> Elmo's world.  Each aspect of the 15 minute segment has a purpose.  Adult
> humor is slid in (jokes that obviously will fly over the heads of children
> much like Robin William's performance in Disney's Alladin).
> 
> Even the little kids on Barney are nauseating.
> 
> -Rob.
> (who watches Bear in the Big Blue House with his 3 year old, my choice of
> channels not his ;-)
> 
> 



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Distaste for Jar-Jar (was: The Censors have won.)
 
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G3IM77.9yF@lugnet.com... (...) explain (...) The Sesame Street magazine had an article on the child psych design of Elmo's world. Each aspect of the 15 minute segment has a purpose. Adult (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.starwars)

25 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR