Subject:
|
Re: Language slipping?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Dec 1999 19:30:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
503 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher Lannan writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > I don't think anyone would argue that obscenity is anything other than a
> > social and/or personal convention, rather than some inherent quality or
> > state; it's largely a matter of consensus. That's not to say obscenity
> > doesn't "exist"--it exists as surely as language or any other social
> > convention, but you're right that it's hard to "prove" one way or the other.
>
> Then tell me what "obscenity" is, since it exists.
Obscene is one of a number of slippery words that are contextually defined.
In most english speaking countries, for example, bodily waste is refered to by
multiple terms, some "obscene", some not. It generally depends on the context
for most of them, but the obvious (common, 4 letter) one is almost invariably
"obscene", as it is defined so by the (common) social context as such.
Generally speaking, when something is being refered to in the crudest terms
available, it is considered "obscene"
Meriam Webster has an excellent definition of obscene that applies to the
debate at hand (def. b):"containing or being language regarded as taboo in
polite usage"
Which was why I started this whole thing in the first place - I found the
language at Lugnet was starting to slide from "polite usage"
I am also a staunch supporter of polite (and creative) degredation in
opposition to crude language. Which is to say "Were you perhaps dropped on
your head as a child?" is far more interesting than "Stupid!" I like british
humour, too. ;)
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Language slipping?
|
| (...) Well, how about another AFOL acronym- CRAPP- obviously NOT "polite usage." I think that it is a convention thing- defined by the community- in this case, however, since LUGNET is worldwide, I guess the standards are Todd's. So I would tender a (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Language slipping?
|
| (...) Then tell me what "obscenity" is, since it exists. (...) That's my point about how subjective it is. One zealot who says any word/image/sound/obj...ought/farm animal is obscene is a crazy man- if we get enough of those zealots together, (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
