Subject:
|
Re: Language slipping?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Dec 1999 00:30:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
314 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:47:19 GMT, "Christopher Lannan"
<shakguy@hotspammail.com> wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Jasper Janssen writes:
>
> > You do know what "funk" was, before the 70's arrived, don't you? Look
> > it up..
> By the way, I just looked it up at websters online, besides the popular music
> meaning, they also had some stuff about being afraid- like being "in a funk"
> That was it. Is there another meaning they didn't list. I would imagine it has
> something to do with things of an "adult" nature.
Merriam Websters' either thinks the meaning is obscene, or that it is
not general enough..
PG advised, the faint-of-heart may look away now.
The meaning I was referring to that I've seen it used as is, how to
put this delicately.. the liquid which results when females of the
human species get, uhhh, "excited".
I never said it was a particularly _nice_ meaning.
Jasper
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Language slipping?
|
| (...) has (...) Ok at the risk of instigating a long thread on a topic that nobody probably wants to continue with, I always thought it was the male not female to which this word referred to???(to put it delicately) This is rather an old fashioned (...) (25 years ago, 26-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Language slipping?
|
| (...) By the way, I just looked it up at websters online, besides the popular music meaning, they also had some stuff about being afraid- like being "in a funk" That was it. Is there another meaning they didn't list. I would imagine it has something (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
