To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 3788
3787  |  3789
Subject: 
Re: Language slipping?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 06:49:28 GMT
Viewed: 
258 times
  
Christopher Lannan wrote in message ...
This all "eye of the beholder" stuff. For example, the English curse word • for
excrement, that starts with an "S" would be commonly considered to be
profanity, but what about in other languages?

Of course just to be troublesome, the S word is actually a perfectly valid
English word. As a verb, it is conjugated similarly to "sit". The only
reason it is vulgar is that a rather uppity Frenchman invited himself into
the English court, and decreed French the language of the state. During this
time, certain English words became passe, and many French words entered the
common language.

Of course I also agree that offensive language should be avoided on Lugnet.
In my mind that includes more than just the set of words you can't say on
the radio.

Frank



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Language slipping?
 
(...) Most of the words in English that refer to "basic" things or actions have a French counter part; the English words are generally considered the baser, informal, or perhaps "lower-class" of the two, while the the French words for the same thing (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: Language slipping?
 
(...) In Sweden, people (well, teenagers actually) use it (or used it) together with "Oh" when things were cool, or went wrong, if a car didn´t stop and hit a wall or something. --Tobias (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Language slipping?
 
(...) I disagree. Using symbols to replace the letters of a "profane" word is not the same as spelling it out. If a young person who does not know such words reads it, he won't know what it means. basically, it's only profane because you interpret (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

32 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR