Subject:
|
Re: Language slipping?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Dec 1999 17:31:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
315 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Jeff Thompson writes:
>
> Oh, good grief. "Poop" is too vulgar for this newsgroup?
>
> Yes, the potty-mouth / bodily function humor of the term was
> entirely the point. See http://www.lugnet.com/loc/uk/?n=2310 for
> a discussion of the history of the term and other acronyms the
> AFOL community has generated.
>
> I think I'll stick with POOP rather than PFOP.
> jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river
I was being not-too-subtly sarcastic. POOP is just fine.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Language slipping?
|
| (...) Sorry - my irony-detector needs rewiring, obviously. (Slinks off abashedly) -- jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily" (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Language slipping?
|
| (...) Oh, good grief. "Poop" is too vulgar for this newsgroup? Yes, the potty-mouth / bodily function humor of the term was entirely the point. See (URL) for a discussion of the history of the term and other acronyms the AFOL community has (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
