Subject:
|
Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Dec 1999 19:28:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
532 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeremy Sproat writes:
> Similarly, I'm equally insulted when someone says "sh*t" instead of "shit". I
> mean, wow, "sh*t" is okay? Is there something magical about that asterisk?
> I'm totally perplexed by the social mores which demand a letter be blanked
> out, for all but the most scatalogically-ignorant to put back together.
> Cheers,
> - jsproat
here's a fun one I thought of a while back-
Given- showing a man shirtless on TV with nipples exposed is ok.
Given- showing a shirtless woman on TV is ok as long as we black out the
nipples.
Question- If I were to take the area of the woman's nipples out of the
picture, and replace that area with a man's nipples, is that ok?
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with
|
| (...) What cracks me up is that a woman's nipple is the single most useful item on the breast. It's like, showing a water fountain, but blacking out the nozzle. How did breasts get to be so obscene? IMO, a thong bikini is more obscene (and painful (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with
|
| (...) I agree, to a point. I think these words tend to insult people even when they're not intended to. [WARNING BAD WORDS COMING UP] [WARNING BAD WORDS COMING UP] [WARNING BAD WORDS COMING UP] [WARNING BAD WORDS COMING UP] [WARNING BAD WORDS COMING (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
