Subject:
|
Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:50:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3479 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy P. Smith wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
When a privately-owned website enforces the TOS to which posters have
explicitly agreed, that’s not censorship.
|
Does that apply to pay-to-view television channels too? If they purposefully
leave out bits of news is it not censorship?
|
Every news show leaves out bits of news. Is all news censored?
Every library excludes some books. Is that censorship?
Tim
|
It depends largely on their reasons for doing it. If it is to purposefully bias
the news (eg. render something not-true through omission) then it is censorship.
But as I said it’s not the best analogy.
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
