Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.religion.flame
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Dec 1998 22:39:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
472 times
|
| |
|
|
> What do you mean Clinton shouldn't be impeached [1]? :)
Unlikely now....
Whenever the going gets tough, he bombs someone to take attention away. :o)
And of course, our Foreign Office continues to phallate (sp?) American
foreign policy. (deliberate pun)
Though I do believe Saddam should be stopped, so close to the season
of goodwill, peace to all mankind, etc. maybe a re-think should be in order.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: lugnet.religion.flame
|
| (...) Saddam should have been assasinated a long time ago, whether by us directly or some group we put on the job. Clinton should have bombed Iraq long before now. Amazingly convenient how he timed it, though. (26 years ago, 18-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: lugnet.religion.flame
|
| (...) What do you mean Clinton shouldn't be impeached [1]? :) --Mike. [1] Impeached, Impaired... how about Imappled or Imgraped? Aren't these words a little unfair to the rest of the fruit community? (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
