Subject:
|
Re: "Saving" Private Lynch
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 May 2003 10:12:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
254 times
|
| |
|
|
> > 1 - there seems to be a peculiar fascination with plagarism in some corners
> > here. I'm rather baffled by why it's so fascinating, actually. I would tend
> > to think that out and out fabrication of facts is far worse than plagarism,
> > and that plagarism by a national newspaper's reporter is rather worse than
> > plagarism of a random line or two here in .debate by one of the regulars...
> > but then I find that last "crime" rather small beer.
Are you saying plagiarism is ~OK~. I think that is the wrong sort of signal to
send.
>
> If it were just me, and it isn't, I think we can let Larry off the carpet
> for this one. I mean, with all the things we can harp on about debating
> techniques, Larrys transgression from a long time ago is small taters
> compared to the trolling, the obfuscation, the outright contempt for
> differing opinions--but your mileage may vary ;)
Ah! So it's Larry who is the plagiarist; I wondered whom he was talking
about! ;)
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "Saving" Private Lynch
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) Well, I don't treat my life like it's made up of binary management--if we remove certain criteria, then we allow *everyting*. I thought it would be inferred by my slam towards the Nat. (...) (21 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
