To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 20890
20889  |  20891
Subject: 
Re: "Saving" Private Lynch
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 15 May 2003 17:21:09 GMT
Viewed: 
122 times
  
Because we all know how the BBC is prone to hperbole, and "faking the truth"
whenever it can...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/correspondent/3028585.stm

Is it still a 'conspiracy nutter' story now?  Or is it perhaps closer to the
truth?

Stop with the talk of anything that doesn't conform to the US 'official' POV
is automatically segregated into the "conspiracy/nut case/irrelevant" list.

Read and watch anything beyond CNN and maybe you'll see a bigger and more
truthful picture.

Dave K



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "Saving" Private Lynch
 
(...) So which point do you take exception to, Scott? "We know that SH has WoMD and we know where they are!" (pause long enuf to have a war about it) "Well, we're withdrawing our inspectors next month 'cause we didn't find anything..." Conspiracies? (...) (22 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

23 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR