Subject:
|
Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 01:46:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
466 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matt Hein writes:
> Actually Richard, that was a damned assumptive remark.
Hey, he has his opinions and I have my own. If he can encompass discussions
of world politics with the words "little things," I think I am allowed to
express an opinion on that comment.
As has been commented before: don't like what you read in off-topic.debate,
don't read it. And if you do choose to read it, wear the flame retardant
suit because it gets hot in here.
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
| (...) While is it true that world politics take far more importance over anything else of the sort, I won't go the the extent to demean those whom veer from that discussion. Well, to each his own, I surmise. (...) Yes, the pressure does compound (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
| (...) Actually Richard, that was a damned assumptive remark. Like some at .debate argue about everything from politics to lego to religion, there are those out there that would rather argue about affairs revolving around sports, cars and movies. So (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
