To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 15755
15754  |  15756
Subject: 
Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:15:07 GMT
Viewed: 
1568 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:

> > Medicine pretty much says that alchol in fair
> > moderation is better to have than to be without.
> 
>  Are you sure about that bit?  I've heard, for instance, that two glasses
> of red wine per week can be heart-beneficial, but that isn't the same as a
> correlation between alcohol consumption and benefit; there are plenty of
> other components in red wine.  If you're referring to other data, I'd be
> interested to read them.

Maybe I got it wrong.  I know about the red wine thing, but I also remember
the frequency of intake being greater, so maybe I'm just mixed up.  I thought
it was a glass per day or something.  But I thought there was some greater
effect attributed to alcohol like blood-thinning or vascular relaxation...or
something.  I'll poke around and see if I can find it.  Sorry for my
imprecision.

>  It's dangerous to assume risk or safety of one substance based on another
> (maybe a little bit of ingested plutonium or would be good for us?)

Good point.  But I've seen people ingest those others and come away seemingly
fine.  I understand that's not the case with plutonium, and lots of other
stuff.

> The issue, at least for cocaine, might be of the danger of imprecise
> self-medication--barring a pre-existing condition, it's pretty hard to OD on
> pot or No-Doz, but cocaine is a trifle more risky.

But maybe if there were a small cocaine industry, education about appropriate
amounts, and materials for measuring -- or even premeasured doses prepared at a
lab would be available.  I can only imagine legalization reducting the number
of ODs.

>  My boy Philp Dick wrote and sold many novels while zonked on speed, chased
> with milkshakes.  Given the right circumstances and personality type, I
> don't doubt certain self-medications can be quite positive!

I keep a small stash of narcotic pharmaceuticals (the most valuable (to me) of
which is codeine cough syrup) for self medication because I know how to use
them safely.  I've never once taken a narcotic for anything but control of
serious pain.  And Tylenol-3s are available right across the border, but I'd
rather have hydrocodone.

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism!
 
(...) That's a good point, too. It's my understanding that a sizable number of OD's result from unpredictable substance purity, rather than from some inherent evil in the substance. Dave! (25 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism!
 
(...) Are you sure about that bit? I've heard, for instance, that two glasses of red wine per week can be heart-beneficial, but that isn't the same as a correlation between alcohol consumption and benefit; there are plenty of other components in red (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

37 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR