 | | Had to Push it? (you immature twit) —John Neal
|
| | | Well, I think this sums it up: (URL) take long. And some moron will eventually come along and burn Jason at Brickfilms as well (to tie in another debate). <sigh> -John (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit) —Rob Drechsel
|
| | | | | (...) This is uncalled for, and it's certainly not needed on brickshelf. I don't want to hear it justified because "it has bricks!" Rob robo2705@hotmail.com (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | "Rob Drechsel" <robo2705@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpJury.DpI@lugnet.com... (...) Jason at (...) don't (...) Though inappropriate, its 'Lego-related content.' I'd be expecting Tom Inosanto to be defending it anytime now. For the record, I (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | (...) Indeed. And now the twit has removed them. I did, however, download the images and will be forwarding them to Kevin for his consideration. -John (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit) —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | | | (...) What if it was Kevin who deleted them? You calling him a twit? ;D Jeff (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) <Ahem> Good point (and for the record-- no:-) -John (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit) —Tom Inosanto
|
| | | | | | (...) Timmy, shut up! How many times do I have to say adult content is not approiate for brickshelf? Really Timmy, how many times must I say this befor it registers in that thick head of yours?? This is really making me sick. (...) SO DO I TIMMY - I (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | "tom" <tinosanto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpKwos.Bpt@lugnet.com... (...) Wow, you're very articulate. And smart too, for finding a derivitave of my name. I applaud you. (...) up... I most definitely did not put that image up. After viewing (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit) —Tom Inosanto
|
| | | | | | Noticed you cut every part where I said that I do not think that image belongs on brickshelf, very clever Timmy. But have you realised that I DO NOT THINK ADULT IMAGES BELONG ON BRICKSHELF! Do you understand this? Really, honestly... do you? tom (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | "tom" <tinosanto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpKxEH.Epo@lugnet.com... (...) Really, (...) Don't you realize typing in all caps is immature? And maybe I snipped that because I had no argument with it or acknowledged it. Maybe you'll never (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I think the admins have dealt with it already because I get a blank page. Can someone (while remaining within the bounds of gentle speech and the LUGNET TOS, please) say what it was? Who or what was it insulting/mocking, etc? Thanks (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | (...) It was an image of a totally naked woman with LEGO bricks covering up the genetalia. -Tim (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Try for summary of this debate... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) (gen*I*talia but who's counting) OK, thanks for that info. I've seen nekkid girls before so I guess I didn't miss much there. But was it anyone we KNOW??? Um, can I suggest that someone summarize the larger discussion and see if it can be put (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Try for summary of this debate... —Kyle Beatty
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: -snip- for brevity (...) A fair summary. Wisely left out the emotional baggage that got picked up on the way. (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Try for summary of this debate... —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | (...) Just looking at the size of these, they seem negligible even compared to the stuff in my own folders. So I don't think bandwidth is a huge factor. The main beef I would have is that they put each one in a separate folder (which you talk about (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Try for summary of this debate... —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Remember, these aren't seen only by people looking at the Brickshelf recent page. They are loaded everytime the owner posts a message to a webforum, which means every time a person reads one of those messages, the images gets loaded (barring (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Try for summary of this debate... —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Can we stop speculating about the bandwidth used. Kevin is really the only one who can answer that, and until we know they are a bandwidth problem, it's somewhat pointless to speculate about that. (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Try for summary of this debate... —Tom Inosanto
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I agree 100%, and even if we did have hard data on this, it is not our place to worry about bandwidth, that concern is Kevin's and not ours. Kevin is the one who pays for it, not us - so he should be the one concerned with this. tom (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Try for summary of this debate... —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | (...) Absolutely agreed. I think we've got to be careful about how we talk about the bandwidth issue until we have hard data. (...) I definitely agree with the above. (...) Umm, isn't a 9 year old breaking Brickshelf's TOS no matter what he/she (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Try for summary of this debate... —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | (...) I'd like to highlight this a bit more. I think it would be a big mistake to make any value judgements based on popularity contests for what content is allowed. A "highlights" page which brought forth folders or images which are highly rated (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | While in Harrisburg... (was: Try for summary of this debate...) —Rob Doucette
|
| | | | | | (...) Larry, while you're here, and if you have a free day, check out the Railroad Museum of PA located in Strasburg, across the street from the Strasburg Railroad. Museum: (URL) Railroad: (URL) fairly easy to get to from Harrisburg (1 hour): Take (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.loc.us.pa.phi.har)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit) —Tom Inosanto
|
| | | | (...) Are you trying to say I did this? If you are saying that I did this please be man enough and say it. I noticed you left out any names on your 'thoughtfull' post. *For the record*, **I did not put any pictres up on brickshelf**, but if your (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
