Subject:
|
Re: GODMONEY (was re: Anthrax worse than AIDS?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:07:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
304 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Simpson writes:
> I never postulated a tragedy-calculus. In terms of public health numbers,
> Anthrax is small potatos, but the difference lies in the fact that it is being
> purposefully propagated and spread, and, as such, deserves immense public
> attention.
As currently deployed, it is indeed small potatoes. I'm sure more people are
killed by food poisoning than anthrax. As a terrorist weapon it is very
effective. I expect the economic cost of its impact must be huge. If the
government treats it seriously, public fears may be allayed.
Post early for Christmas!
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: GODMONEY (was re: Anthrax worse than AIDS?)
|
| (...) I understand that the root of his issue was not bible purchases per se, but his GodMoney comments were red herrings meant to attack willy-nilly and make broad- brush generalizations about people of faith and their motives and concerns. (...) I (...) (23 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
