Subject:
|
Re: Anthrax worse than AIDS?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 21:43:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
139 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Horst Lehner writes:
> ... or why foreign patents are less important than US patents
>
> To me it seems the US are trying to save some money in this case, whereas
> they did just about everything to protect their own profits with anti AIDS
> products. This even extends beyond enforcing their patents, in that they
> threatened with economic war in at least one case where a country wanted to
> manufacture their own anti AIDS drugs *without* violating US patents.
Make that two: Brazil and South Africa. I have followed the brazilian case
through Cable, so I understood some of the $$ involved. Nasty $-diplomacy...
The brazilians have had some success since the introduction of
State-manufactered drugs in AIDS-control.
> National emergency? Doesn't this apply a lot more to some countries with
> high numbers of HIV positive people, than to the US with a few Anthrax cases
> right now [1]?
I dunno. The thing about Anthrax is that it is very easily disseminated, and
it has faster effects. OTOH, Anthrax *isn't* 100% lethal, and it is endemic
in some countries... (take mine, for instance). So they are rather
different, and I think they may require different approaches.
> :wq
>
> Horst
>
> [1] To my knowledge, none of these actually requires Bayer's Cipro,
> because other products are working as well for the type of bacteria
> that have been found up to now.
Precaution, maybe?
Anyway, what is Bayer's capability of Cipro production/distribution (# of
people simulteneously treated), and what is the effective # of *suspected*
cases?
I think the US have antecipated a scenario far worse than it is happening...
Pedro
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Anthrax worse than AIDS?
|
| ... or why foreign patents are less important than US patents To me it seems the US are trying to save some money in this case, whereas they did just about everything to protect their own profits with anti AIDS products. This even extends beyond (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
