To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14324
14323  |  14325
Subject: 
Anthrax worse than AIDS?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 21:21:39 GMT
Viewed: 
141 times
  
... or why foreign patents are less important than US patents

To me it seems the US are trying to save some money in this case, whereas
they did just about everything to protect their own profits with anti AIDS
products. This even extends beyond enforcing their patents, in that they
threatened with economic war in at least one case where a country wanted to
manufacture their own anti AIDS drugs *without* violating US patents.

National emergency? Doesn't this apply a lot more to some countries with
high numbers of HIV positive people, than to the US with a few Anthrax cases
right now [1]?

:wq

Horst

[1] To my knowledge, none of these actually requires Bayer's Cipro,
    because other products are working as well for the type of bacteria
    that have been found up to now.



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Anthrax worse than AIDS?
 
(...) Make that two: Brazil and South Africa. I have followed the brazilian case through Cable, so I understood some of the $$ involved. Nasty $-diplomacy... The brazilians have had some success since the introduction of State-manufactered drugs in (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  GODMONEY (was re: Anthrax worse than AIDS?)
 
Horst: Absolutely right. What matters over here is GOD and MONEY, or GODMONEY. Nobody cares if thousands of homosexuals suffer and die. Bible sales are up. At the top of the music charts are patriotic songs (sung by a French woman?). Our civil (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Anthrax worse than AIDS?
 
(...) Foreign patents are no less important than US patents in my view and that of Mr. Goldberg (URL)To me it seems the US are trying to save some money in this case, whereas (...) Mr. Goldberg makes the argument that this attempt to steal Bayer's (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

22 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR