To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 12064
12063  |  12065
Subject: 
Re: A Brave New World
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 06:09:51 GMT
Viewed: 
276 times
  
Christopher Weeks wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Courtney writes:

I understand the bald eagle is an endangered species, not to mention our
national bird.  The fact that it has eggs adds a bit of weight.  But, I'm sure
there would have been ways to safely transplant the bird to another location
where it can still exist in its natural habitat.

You are sure of this...why?

Hm, maybe because we are successfully raising bald eagles and releasing them to the
wild?


They let one animal be the
difference between a more efficient airport access road, even AFTER they • kicked
the HUMANS in the area out.  Something's messed up there, when nature and
animals have more rights than people.

Animls don't have more rights than people.

Tell that to the treehuggers that are snarling up the courts to delay projects left
and right.


However, people are just beginning
to take our role as stewards of this planet seriously.  It would have been
better if they could have identified the eagle's presense before migrating the
people, but sometimes accidents happen.  I happen to support the stance that we
can not afford to lose more species.

Moving ONE eagle != wiping out the species.


We just don't know what untold treasures
lie in the genes of the critters that we're destroying.  Apart from the
aesthetic that tells me that buldozing endangered species is inappropriate,
from the selfish stance of our species, migrating a few people around is small
potatoes compared to losing such resources for all time.

I might agree IF it were the balance of an entire species at stake, but ONE eagle?
Bah!

What's worse is when multi-million (maybe even billion) dollar projects that would
benefit millions of people are held up for some fish that only inhabits one creek
somewhere.  Sorry, you're not going to convince me that a guppy is more important
than people.


--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A Brave New World
 
(...) You are sure of this...why? (...) kicked (...) Animls don't have more rights than people. However, people are just beginning to take our role as stewards of this planet seriously. It would have been better if they could have identified the (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

24 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR