Subject:
|
Re: A Brave New World
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 22 Jul 2001 21:41:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
213 times
|
| |
|
|
I understand some of the benefits that cloning technology could have.
Unfortunately, I'm a bit leary (paranoid? Biased?) that the technology seems
to be nearing success at the same time that population control is becoming a
serious issue...the repurcussions could eventually weed out individualism,
which I am entirely against.
There must be other alternatives to living in "harmony" with the Earth's
ecosystem.
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kirby Warden writes:
>
> > I believe it is no accident that the european nations are pursuing the
> > science of cloning while speaking out against procreation. The only sane
> > reason for this is to ensure a future population that has been manufactured.
>
> Kirby,
>
> It sounds from this and a subsequent response that you might be opposed to
> clone-related research. That's not so is it? What's to be against?
>
> Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A Brave New World
|
| Unfortunately, there isn't any way we can live in "harmony" with mother nature. If we really wanted to preserve Earth, then we'd have to give up our current lifestyles. Yup, no more SUV's, no more fertilizer (nitrogen), no more nuclear powerplants, (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A Brave New World
|
| (...) Kirby, It sounds from this and a subsequent response that you might be opposed to clone-related research. That's not so is it? What's to be against? Chris (23 years ago, 22-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
