To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *9521 (-20)
  Re: Todd and Eric's attitude (was Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
 
(...) Guys, take it off-line, please. James (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Todd and Eric's attitude (was Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
 
(...) You are obviously correct, of course; I didn't remember that incident. (...) Again, I never said I thought you were 13. Please stop indicating that I did. (...) Well, it wasn't meant as one. There is nothing wrong with being young and not (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Todd and Eric's attitude (was Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
 
(...) Ah, that is where you are mistaken. Here, (URL) that may jog your memory. If I am a 13-year-old, then I was 7 hen i had a son - now that would have been something. You can not judge somebody by words they use, I think Scott Chambers put it (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
 
Hi, I'll go to Tom first and Bill second. (...) Not in terms of breathing, but in terms of heat dissipation, it's better an issue now when something can theoretically be done about it. If cleaner plants mean higher energy costs, IMHO the best (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Todd and Eric's attitude (was Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
 
(...) The tone and vocabulary of every post you make. As you said elsewhere, that's the only evidence I have of anything about you, and it strongly indicated to me that you were not an adult. Which, BTW, is not an insult. Beleive it or not, there (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Todd and Eric's attitude (was Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
 
(...) What evidence? I would LOVE to see what evidence you have or had. And FYI, words are not prrof -we come from different places - so we use different words. Plese visit this post, it was for you: (URL)eric (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Todd and Eric's attitude (was Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
 
(...) I haven't made any personal attacks. Sorry. I made an observation based on the evidence at hand, one which I beleived- and still beleive- was true. In retrospect, there was no reason to post it, I simply should have stopped engaging in a (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
 
I personally don't think global warming from our CO2 output is an issue AT THIS time. However, if we continue to level all the greenery near the equator that converts the CO2 to O2 that is useful to us, it might actually become an issue in the (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
 
(...) He's demonstrated in two big ways so far that he's not the President he was campaigning to be. The "Uniter-not-a-divider" has rammed far-Right policy and cabinet appointments down the throat of bipartisanship, and now he's backed off a (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
 
(...) I think he deserves the benefit of the doubt. He hasn't demonstrated, here or in Texas, that he's one of those kinds of politicians yet. (...) That would be better than selling "nucular" technology to foreign enemies for campaign (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
 
(...) You're aware, I trust, that the President can pardon whomever he (or, when the time comes, she) chooses, right? Perhaps we might ask why Bush pardoned Weinberger or why Ford pardoned Nixon. Obviously the Rich pardon was performed in a (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
 
(...) Perhaps he's referring to this: (URL) wait, my mistake--that article identifies the greenhouse effect as real. And before anyone gripes about the Clinton News Network pushing a pointy-headed liberal agenda, the study appears in the scientific (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
 
I forgot a couple things, sorry. :^P (...) Many of the old power generators are driven by diesel engines. Coal engines, too. (...) Found this a few minutes ago. (URL) Admiral Muffin Head (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
 
(...) I can't believe you think his concerns are noble. His concern is for all those big factories that are going to line his pockets (or donate to his next campaign, or whatever) when he allows them to spew carbon dioxide in copious amounts. (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
 
(...) Betch ol' "W" will be helpin' promote his homeland's other interest, should Mad Cow threaten his other buddies. Here's a new slogan for "W": "Beef and Oil, goes together like Dorothy and the Wicked Witch. Home cooking, like mama used to make." (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
 
(...) Hail, Grand Admiral, Sir! Sgt. Farkas requests permission to speak freely, Sir. I read the story and didn't see anything about oil. Also, you can't discount his (W's) stated concern about energy prices, especially living on the west coast. And (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: An Apology
 
(...) This whole incident reminds me that we should all be understanding that the written word is sometimes hard to interpret correctly. One thing I was immediately curious, noticing that Mladen is posting from a Canadian e-mail address is if he is (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: An Apology
 
Rec'vd and duely noted, I must say for All to know, Mladen sent me a private e-mail apologizing for misdeeds done, I encouraged him not to fret and that I too was a little at fault, However, and more importantly, I would ask all the fellow LUGNETers (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: WOW ~ #1593 Classic Space ~ WOW!!!...!!!
 
Hey, I was just a little disturbed because I posted first about a good sale, but my thread was so small compared with the second person who posted the same sale. Kind of stupid but what the heck. When I read this new thread that was basically (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  An Apology
 
As lame as it sounds giving an apology after several people have already told me that I am rude, mean, and possibly evil person, I am still going to try to repent my evil deeds. To whom it may concern, I, Mladen Pejic, apologize to Eric Sophie and (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build.mecha)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR