Subject:
|
Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:45:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
164 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mark Sandlin writes:
> in article GA9wp9.C3K@lugnet.com, Bill Farkas wrote:
>
> > I read the story and didn't see anything about oil. Also, you can't discount
> > his (W's) stated concern about energy prices, especially living on the west
> > coast.
>
> I can't believe you think his concerns are noble.
I think he deserves the benefit of the doubt. He hasn't demonstrated, here
or in Texas, that he's one of those kinds of politicians yet.
> His concern is for all those big factories that are going to line his
> pockets (or donate to his next campaign, or whatever) when he allows them to
> spew carbon dioxide in copious amounts.
That would be better than selling "nucular" technology to foreign enemies
for campaign contributions, wouldn't it? And how 'bout Big Unions, etc.
All he said was that he wasn't going to do it right now because of high
energy prices, that doesn't preclude him from doing it in the future.
>
> Washington State power companies are currently charging us out the yahoos
> and telling us to conserve so they can sell our power to California. But
> wait! Big businesses are getting power rate cuts when they conserve! But not
> us little people, sorry.
And this is all because of environmentalists and the nonexistent energy
policy of the last eight years. Big business makes the world go 'round -
they deserve a break. Democrat tax policy puts small business out of
business thereby ensuring the longevity and growth of Big business anyhow.
> > And as far as Big Oil is concerned...ever here of a guy named Mark Rich -
> > the Big Oil tycoon who purchased a pardon?! Democrats are such
> > "hippie-cricks". (Anyone remember where that's from?) They complain about
> > and try to sue tobacco companies and then offer homeless people cigarettes
> > if they vote - so much for being against smoking and for the homeless!
>
> Bill, all politicians are hypocrites.
I agree about 90% of them are, but not all.
> > I also disagree with Miss Whitman's statement that global warming is a "real
> > phenomena." There are many studies that say it is not. IMO, it's a tool of
> > environmental extremists to punish prosperity and capitalism in this
> > country.
>
> Really? Which studies? Please be specific.
I drive alot and listen to alot of 24-hour news stations, I heard about it
many times there. I'll look when I get a chance - I'm currently in St. Louis
heading for Baltimore.
>
> > Third-world countries produce far more pollution than the entire
> > U.S. does and no one targets them.
>
> How do you suggest we control their emissions? Invade?
I can rally the troops at your command, Grand Admiral Sir!
My point was that only the U.S. is the target and concern for all of the
controls and restrictions by international interests. Environmentalists feel
guilty about our prosperity. Homeless activists (same ilk) will sleep on
sewer grates so they can "identify" with them, but won't accept them into
their own homes to shelter them. What does that achieve? CFC's were the
boogey-man of the past and were also shown to little to no effect on the
environment.
> ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head
Bill
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
|
| (...) He's demonstrated in two big ways so far that he's not the President he was campaigning to be. The "Uniter-not-a-divider" has rammed far-Right policy and cabinet appointments down the throat of bipartisanship, and now he's backed off a (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
|
| (...) He's been pretty much a straight corporate shill. Nor does he care the slightest about California voters, just corporate profit. I'm not surprised at any of this, but I am surprised at the people in denial about it both before the election and (...) (23 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
|
| (...) I can't believe you think his concerns are noble. His concern is for all those big factories that are going to line his pockets (or donate to his next campaign, or whatever) when he allows them to spew carbon dioxide in copious amounts. (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
