 | | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
|
(...) D A N G E R ! Big mistake Dave. You are being objective. This is nothing but evidence of: a) Your bias. b) Your support for "PLO terrorists". c) The power of the international anti-Israeli media conspiracy. In the future, try to view this as a (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
|
(...) *sigh* (...) 2 Examples of Israel's terrorism: 1. How would you describe what Ariel Sharon done to the village of Qibya in 1953? 2. How about their planned attacks on cinemas inside Egypt? Scott A (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | avoiding the conclusion (was Re: jumping to conclusions)
|
|
John, I started by saying you were jumping to conclusions, now I feel you are avoiding the conclusion. I had hoped that your formal study of the “Israeli-Arab Dilemma” would mean that I would be provided with some meaningful insight into the current (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
|
(...) So what's a Palestinian to do? Speak out against the PLO? Peacemakers aren't very welcome in the Arab world--just ask Sadat's widow. (...) None really, except to note that the US media is getting *so* biased that it is surprising even itself. (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
|
(...) No reason? I think you definitely had a reason. But if it is to imply that I hate Scott, you're wrong. I disagree with him, and I called him an idiot because what he proposed was idiocy-- that's all. (...) Which "heinous war crimes" is Israel (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
|
(...) You said: 1. “Sorry, there isn't one. “ 2. “The PLO represent the Palestinians.” 3. “Whatever the PLO does, the Palestinians support them.” 4. “Anyone who supports the actions of terrorists is just as culpable as the terrorists themselves.” (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
|
(...) Indeed, as an objective news source, this is right up there with the IDF site! ;-) Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) I just thought that those two lines should be viewed together. No reason... Just because the atrocity is sanctioned by the government, it doesn't make the atrocity (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
|
(...) that at least some people do get it. :) Dan (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Peace in the Mid-East?
|
|
Here is an Article by Mona Charen. I think anyone who cares about the subject should read it. As of posting the link refers to her April 5th article. Her April 12th article is worth reading as well. (URL) Main Creators Syndicate Page is here (URL) (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
|
(...) I think I clarified that. I said that if they *support* terrorists, they are as *culpable* as terrorists. Since the PLO represents them, they are in the unfortunate position of supporting terrorism. They are being woefully misled. Or (...) (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
|
(...) I said: "My views on human rights and international law, together with my understanding of recent middle-east history, leads me to sympathize with the Palestinian people, not with "PLO terrorists". I hope you understand the distinction between (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Is global communication bringing everyone together?
|
|
(...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Is global communication bringing everyone together?
|
|
An interesting article by George PAcker in NYT - free reg reqd. "In some ways, global satellite TV and Internet access have actually made the world a less understanding, less tolerant place. What the media provide is superficial familiarity -- (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
|
(...) Having this discussion with you is futile-- I *never* said that I thought all Palestinians are terrorists. From your "sighs" in previous posts, it seems to me that you think that you have such a superior command of facts. Have you ever been to (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
|
(...) I shall let Dan answer that. ;) Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
|
(...) I did not expect an answer from you on this. The reality is that anyone who did celebrate the loss of life on September-11 probably would view those killed as being supporters of the “Zionist oppressor/aggressor/whatever”. That is, in the same (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
|
(...) And is a jest any less legitimate than any other form of art? ROSCO (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
|
(...) Nicely said! The second someone's actions negatively impact on someone else, is where the line is drawn. If a person gets his kicks by reading dirty magazines, he has the freedom to do so. If he leaves the magazine laying around for kids to (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
|
(...) Sorry-- couldn't resist:-) (...) It is an interesting scenario. I am not for the government restricting the rights of adults so much as I am concerned about protecting minors from disgusting things adults like to do. Although she *is* free to (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
