To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *13176 (-20)
  Re: Who are we to judge?
 
(...) And Bricksmith Brian Stokes too. ((URL) I dunno if he's a full prof or just an instructor or what. He, wisely, stays out of .debate as well. It's kind of like a cross between a drug addiction and the sick pleasure some get in watching a train (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Eat this!!!!!
 
(...) Um, can I have it be just the sort of movies I watch instead of all of them? Then my life would be romantic-comedy-SF-porn. (but no horror, I never watch those) You know? I think I would LIKE that. FUT fun (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Debunk this?
 
(...) A lot. Some have passed, and some, as you point out, have been vetoed. I would ask you though, if you think UN resolutions are something to pick and choose from, or whether one has to accept them all. If the latter, does that mean you (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who are we to judge?
 
(...) I think Mike's comments here demonstrate a vital tension in Western society, and possibly all societies. One of the defining attributes of social living is task specialisation: farmers, soldiers, leaders. An individual can have many strings to (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who are we to judge?
 
(...) Not tenured, adjunct at best. All of our dignity has been thoroughly crushed. :D (Wait, why the heck am I grinning about that?!?) John Ladasky too, but he doesn't poke into .debate AFAIK. best LFB (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Eat this!!!!!
 
"Jeff Stembel" <jeff.stembel@noaa.gov> wrote in message news:GK5zvA.FJ9@lugnet.com... (...) Well there seems no end of do gooders who want to blame most other things they dont agree with like drugs, violence, sex, etc, on the influence of (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: why not just give them the Olympics? (was Re: From a mailing list)
 
"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:GK6C76.MpA@lugnet.com... (...) I see one of the spokepersons at the Liberal Democrate Party conference today called for the Afgans to be bombed with food. regards lawrence (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Debunk this?
 
(...) certain (...) my (...) democracy? (...) in (...) of (...) That's ridiculous. (...) - David (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Debunk this?
 
(...) Who threatened you? Maybe I missed it. (...) I'm not hiding behind anything, I'm here whenever you want to follow through on YOUR OWN statements. Stick to the facts: You got rude, I drew a line, you insisted otherwise, I said prove it, you (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Debunk this?
 
(...) Because violence begets violence, hates begets hate. The only way to overcome it and live in peace is to not play the game. But how can the Palestinians overcome a bunch of racist, exclusionist thugs like the Zionists especially when they are (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who are we to judge?
 
(...) Sorry, I calls them as I sees them. And if anything, I was trying to antagonize people into being anything BUT political sheep. You should do as pleases you. But I wasn't attacking you for anything more than defending the words of a man I (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Debunk this?
 
(...) Okay, if I made threats, then what did I threaten to do to Tom? He was the one who threatened to treat me rudely in person. I thought it was clear that I was calling the barking dog off his porch. And I also thought I made it clear I had no (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Debunk this?
 
(...) Did I ever threaten any specific person in here with direct violence? No, but I got threatened by cowards. (...) Showing your stripes again - hiding behind insults. I am far from a coward. If something really matters to me, I'll defend (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who are we to judge?
 
(...) I would like to bring the people responsible to justice. Just not by whatever means necessary. I believe in a measured approach that risks as few American (and other peoples') lives as possible. I'd just like to point out that if bin Laden is (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Debunk this?
 
David: Okay, now we are caught up in nit-picking over the incidents of both sides and what constitutes protecting citizens when some of them are de facto PLO members who oppose and resent Israeli rule. We might as well stop here... No one is (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  why not just give them the Olympics? (was Re: From a mailing list)
 
I have to agree with the general emphasis of the text below. If the richer nations of the world could share a little of their wealth then perhaps the world would be slightly better. Feeding the starving inside Afghanistan lets the Afghans see that (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Debunk this?
 
(...) Democracy. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Sorting Air Safety (Re: Rooting out nests of snakes and destroying them)
 
"Dave Low" <stinglessbee@hotSPA...Email.com> wrote in message news:GJx646.ICw@lugnet.com... (...) of angry (...) picture. (...) Show (...) I actually replied to myself. Scott A (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Debunk this?
 
"Daniel Jassim" <danieljassim@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GK1t0t.6G7@lugnet.com... (...) terrorist (...) I have to agree with this analogy. Who sponsors this terrorism? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Debunk this?
 
(...) Why expect me to "debunk" this? I do not offer blind support to the Palestinians - although you do appear to blindly oppose them. I am not an apologist for Palestinians or the Israelis. You should not forget that the Israelis have sought to (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR