To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *11516 (-20)
  Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon
 
I am highly appreciative for sites such as this. Often they can explain better thatn myself the differece between scientific fact and personal biased speculation... I took the liberty of reading several articles on that site thoroughly absorbed (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: on topic?
 
my post here was emotional I suppose. The thread "is this sexism?" has changed topic several times now and did not seem to be a bother, at least not for me. Then a personal argument sprung up where someone became irritated that the topic had changed (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
 
(...) Funny, my dictionary here at work (The American Heritage 3rd edition) gives this definition: Neither moral nor immoral Try dictionary.com and see what you come up with. (or should I do the legwork for you?) Tell you what, I'll mail you my (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
 
(...) What's wrong with that? Are you advocating limits on speech rights? If you don't want your kids exposed to porn and violence - monitor what they are watching. Just because the US is a democracy doesn't mean the the individual household has to (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
 
(...) I'm saying that I agree with Larry. Do you think I'm disagreeing? What are you looking for here? (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
 
(...) "Meat related agricultural..." Seems a little vague to me, but I think I understand what you are getting at from the rest of the thread. You'll also have to bear with me since I am at work and am unwilling to go to either site while at work. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
 
(...) Interestingly, my thesaurus give these replacements for “amoral”. Unprincipled Unethical Dishonourable Unscrupulous *Immoral* Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
 
(...) You have asked this already. I have answered it already. (...) I think we tend to group socially with those who have morals which match our own. (...) Your own values are your own. We are all individuals. (...) A great deal. (...) Yes (...) It (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
 
When did the polling take place? What group was polled – age/sex/ethnic background? What order were the questioned asked in? Was any supplemental information given? How was the poll undertaken - telephone / face-to-face/via the web? Were any other (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
 
(...) Perhaps it is time it was brought into the 21st century? Much of it is based on the English bill of rights which dates back to 1689. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: What is spam? (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment
 
(...) How right you are. But pasting all this LP crap into LUGNET is one step away from pasting adds for chocalte bars or cars. There are real issue out their which are worth talking about - your selfish breed of politics is not. It often surprises (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
 
(...) I do not think that "lack" is strong enough to suggest that. But, even if it is I still think it is negative. (...) I have. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
 
(...) I already have. Like I said before, read before you post. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
 
(...) Are you saying the dictionary larry quoted is wrong? Are you saying the one I quoted is wrong? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment
 
(...) Larry is right. Read on through the thread and you will see that I have indeed changed my mind. -Duane (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kirby Warden writes (in part): (...) I'll come out on this one. I love the film, Capricorn One [1]. I believe the hoax theory is plausible [2], and I even doubted the veracity of the moon landing for a few days a couple (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Conspiracy theories: little green men
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes (in part): (...) Actually, I think the consprirists only believe the moon landings themselves were faked, not the space program, nor the earth orbits. They seem to believe that we have orbited the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: on topic?
 
(...) Well, I agree with the suggestion, but not for the same reason. Generally, I have no problem with threads changing subject, as long as the subject line points this out. However, as I use the web interface to post to Lugnet (most of the time), (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon
 
Here's a page that's highly biased against the hoax theory, but has links to lotsa stuff on both sides. ROSCO (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Dog in pool incident
 
(...) I'm not deluded about it now. Perhaps I should say that I felt that way AT THE TIME (i.e. I thought I was teaching that jerk a lesson). I realize now as an adult that beating him up didn't somehow convince him to be a better person. More than (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR