 | | Re: LEGO® Blocked by Best-Lock
|
|
(...) That's a good question. I have some Best-Lock instruction books (but no boxes) from '98 or '99, and I'll check them when I get home to see if the logo included a brick. I didn't realize that about the LEGO logo. Hmm... (...) Very true. There (...) (21 years ago, 11-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Blocked by Best-Lock
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) It's interesting that the Best-Lock logo uses their version of a 1 x 6 brick, not a 2 x 4 brick design. Did they change from a 2 x 4 logo during the course of this suit? Lego used to use the 2 x 4 as part of the "SYSTEM" logo, but (...) (21 years ago, 11-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Blocked by Best-Lock
|
|
(...) This is good news! I can’t think of a single reason why any company should be empowered to dictate which competitors are and are not allowed into the market, so this victory will benefit consumers and competitors alike. Besides which, anyone (...) (21 years ago, 11-Oct-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Network issues - looking for help
|
|
(...) Thanks to all of those that helped, after endless hours (actually DAYS) of work and frustration... The network is finally working!!! Thank you very much, to Chris, Ross, and Andy, between combining their most excellent advice, with my not so (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Network issues - looking for help
|
|
(...) Oops, my mistake, I mean the subnet mask is 255.255.255.0 (not the default gateway, as I had stated) This geek stuff is eating my brain. Janey "Red Brick" (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Network issues - looking for help
|
|
(...) When we went to ipconfig... the info we got was the same... 192.168.2.10 mine 192.168.2.11 for him 192.168.2.1 for the router default gateway 255.255.255.0 we are both getting the router (192.168.2.1) for the default gateway Janey "Lost and (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Network issues - looking for help
|
|
(...) What's the IPs on these 3 nics? (yours, the router and the son's?) Sounds like his machine is getting an IP on a different subnet than yours from the router, and not getting his gateway ip set up right. (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Bennett IS unworthy of being used as toilet paper
|
|
(...) It's a self-portrait, so he has no one to blame but himself. (...) We are getting somewhere at last. :-) (...) Followed by immediate regression. Since you admit that you are biased, how do the claims you are making have any validity? Not to (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Network issues - looking for help
|
|
Can anyone make heads or tails out of this network issue??? My computer (running XP HomeEd.) can access the Internet without issue. History... I have been using highspeed for a bit, and my children were starting to complain about dial up, as well as (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
|
(...) Heston should keep his mouth shut, then? (...) $40,000,000 to discover a non-crime seems a bit excessive. Other than such a criminal waste of money, I must admit I'm with you in saying I couldn't care less (the only time I care is when some (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
|
(...) Appropriate? Don't know if I use that word. Listen, most of the news churned out by the media is pure pulp. Think Hollywood. I couldn't care less about a star's private life; in fact, the less I know about it, the better for them, because I (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | CD instructions
|
|
Hello I'm JAC, My last modell, is another truck, yet. And, I like to have more informations of my MOC, to built another one easely. Before, I took a lot of photos, but, this time, I create a CD informations, and I propose to sell someone. You can (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Test
|
|
Hi, just to see, if my message go well (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
|
(...) Hey, something just occurred to me. With your above statement in mind, would you say that it is appropriate or inappropriate to have a citizen's private extramarital affair dragged through the media for months on end? Just curious... As (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bennett IS unworthy of being used as toilet paper
|
|
(...) Because he is neither the idiot nor the racist he's painted to be. (...) Fair enough. (...) Well, yes, because I know of him and know his politics, and so I know that the charges against him are baseless. As far as "defending Bennett to get at (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bennett IS unworthy of being used as toilet paper
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote: s to say it. (...) I doubt it. He chose a racist example to make his point. (...) He didn't he have an inkling? Okay, he is an idiot then. Racist, idiot: I don't see why you would bother to defend either. (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bennett IS unworthy of being used as toilet paper
|
|
(...) -snippity snip snip- (...) This is the part that is making everyone upset. Bennett is saying that blacks are a large source of crime, and is linking "criminality" to "blackness." He IS using reducio ad absurdum, but he is using it on the issue (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Can this guy get any more infuriating???
|
|
(URL) Bush, in a high-profile address on Thursday, said the global fight against terrorism must continue in Iraq because it is where terrorists are centering their war on humanity. "We're facing a radical ideology with an unalterable objective, to (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) !
|
| |
| | Re: Bennett IS unworthy of being used as toilet paper
|
|
(...) They won't say it because it is patently absurd, just as Bennett was arguing reductio ad absurdum. (...) ???!! I'm sleighed, -->Bruce<-- (...) Come on! You seriously can't think that Bennett had any inkling that this action was anything but (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Screw Abstinence?
|
|
(...) Yes but in the context of this argument it is irrelevant whether or not the implicit support also applies to other things, in a debate on abortion it is the stance on abortion that is most important. That said, I somewhat agree with bringing (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
