Subject:
|
Re: Sellers of Guarded Inn as if it were 6067, BE ON NOTICE!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade
|
Date:
|
Sun, 29 Jul 2001 20:46:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2032 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Ben Cox writes:
> > In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Timothy Wade writes:
> > And that brings me back to the main point of my question - the consumer
> > obviously was not as informed as he should have been. What, if anything, can
> > we do about that? Is it our job? Or should we just stand by the "buyer • beware"
> > axiom?
>
> I personally don't agree with interfering with a legitimate auction. To
> interfere would be like assuming a "Robin-Hood" type role. Definitely not • fair
> for the seller, and certainly not our job.
>
> |3en
From my Original Post:
> > I did something in a similar vien the other day, although it wasn't quite the
> > same and on retrospect, I'm a little ashamed.... Poor taste? Yes. Unethical? • Probably. It just angered me to see this fellow willing to shell out over $100
> > for something that he need not. Of course I've vowed never to do this again,
> > but it goes along the same vien.
I understand that it's not our position to interfere with a legitimate auction,
and it was a gut reaction to seeing the auction, and like I said in my original
post, I won't ever do it again. I was thinking aloud that it wasn't fair to the
person who bought or planned on buying the original set.
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
