 | | Brickbay Status —Dan Jezek
|
| | | Hi All, I've been without internet access for the past week (business trip) and yesterday came back and the site has been down. It has been down for the past 2 days to the best of my knowledge. I called Interland tech support and they said the site (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade) !!
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Dan Jezek writes: <snip another tale of "abuse" but it's by Interland, not the (long suffering) BB owner or users> From the "Dan already knows this but I feel better saying it" department: Man oh man do you need to (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Kevin Salm
|
| | | | | | (...) Dan, if there is any way in which we can be of service in your battle against Interland.com please let us know. If there is a specific email address or telephone number that would be more effective, let us know. I called Interland support (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status (frustrations of the nations) —Melody Brown
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Kevin Salm writes: ... (...) At one time when I was on, there were approx 698 users according to the counter at the top right. I have never seen that many on there before at once. In the past week it had been like (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status (frustrations of the nations) —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | | | (...) Right, the first time I saw this 'phenomenon', it started out at a regular number (40-50 users) then climbed steadily until it topped out just over 800. I think this is a strong candidate for the 'abuse' that Interland mentioned to Dan. (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status (frustrations of the nations) —Dejan Pavlovic
|
| | | | | | | (...) with (...) restore (...) the (...) The same question swept through my mind ... Man would I be happy to read that Brickbay has moved to more reliable place :-) ! -- Enjoy ! Dejan & Nives Lugnet # 595 Brickbay: (URL) Sanders" <rsanders@svic.net> (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status (frustrations of the nations) —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | | "Ray Sanders" <rsanders@svic.net> wrote in message news:GFGq3A.2A3@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) regular (...) 800. I (...) to (...) interesting (...) Did the LUGNET spoofer move on to sabotage Brickbay since Todd seems to have (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status (frustrations of the nations) —Kevin Salm
|
| | | | | | (...) QUIET !!!! Don't give him any ideas.... __ (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Rob Doucette
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Paul Janssen
|
| | | | | (...) There seemed to be alot more down-time when the email feature started working 3 days ago. Elas, about 24 hours after emails started to flow out again, it got shut down. If the volume problem is in the email, I much rather would have brickbay (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Dejan Pavlovic
|
| | | | | | | Hi all ! (...) far is (...) other (...) another (...) We TOTALLY agree with you .. at least let it work - buyers would find thier ways to sellers and sellers can always check their orders received + get emails adresses from buyers on the web -online (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Julie Krenz
|
| | | | | | (...) 3 (...) is (...) another (...) *If* cutting out the emails is going to be the fix, I'd vote to keep the wanted notification emails (if possible) and can the order emails. If the type of payment and insurance option info could be included in (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) They go to the top. ++Lar (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I don't know the exact figures involved, but it's possible that the 'abuse' is perceived spamming. If you've got a lot of mail going to individual ISPs/mail systems, it's possible you're exceeding the set limit each ISP allows from an (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | That would defeat the purpose of the Wanted emails, unless it only sent them out to everyone at specific times of the day. There have been too many times where I've gone to order part(s) from a Wanted email not 5 minutes after getting the email, and (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I'd assume most opportunistic shoppers are using the Wanted messages, so if the mail is sent to everyone at (about) the same time, there's little difference that way. But if someone is browsing/searching the website, and happens across the (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | | In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Steve Bliss writes: <snip> (...) What I usually do is ... 1) Batch upload the new parts 2) Go thru all the categories and merge like entries (old -> new) 3) Release the wanteds I do it like this because I would (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Ray Sanders writes: <snip> How do you: (...) Thanks! ++Lar (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: How to send Brickbay Wanted Notifications —Clark Stephens
|
| | | | | | Lar, Here's what I've figured out... If you use the XML Bulk uploader, the wanted notifications are "saved" on a different page. There is a link on the bulk upload confirmation page that takes takes you to the wanted notify screen & automatically (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | (...) Something about this kept bothering me. Finally the light went on :) The mail transport between BrickBay and Interland appears to be quite quirky (and thats being nice). I went back and examined the headers on a number of BrickBay generated (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | (...) For the record, it took 3 hours for that test msg to get back to me. I think Interland's mail transport could use a little improvement. cc's from lugnet posts usually arrive in 15 secs. (...) Ray (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Bob Parker
|
| | | | | (...) On one hand, a faster mail system would be great for Brickbay emails, but on the other hand, I am very happy just to be receiving ANY emails at all from Brickbay! The delay in receiving Wanted Item notify emails is more of a problem for me as (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickbay Status —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Well, there IS all that spam they need to relay. That HAS to take higher priority because it's so important to their positive customer image and high ranking on the RBL list, right? Actual messages that actually may result in people actually (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
