| |
In lugnet.market.appraisal, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.market.appraisal, David Arnon writes:
> > What about cigarette smoke?
> > How does it effect the score?
>
> c /effect/affect/
>
> or
>
> c /How does it effect/What effect does it have on/
>
> GRIN
>
> But anyway, great question. I think it should have a strong negative effect,
> or that is, it should affect the score negatively. GRIN again.
>
> I don't know if it should just be a downgrade or a separately scored thing,
> but I lean toward separately scored. I just don't want it. Other people
> (heavy smokers) could care less and should be comfortable with pristine but
> smoky stuff (instead of shying away because the score suggests it's less
> than pristine, which is what would happen if it was just a downcheck)
c /could/couldn't/
or
c /could care less/could care less, but not much,/
8?)
ROSCO
FUT: wherever...
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
| (...) Trust me, if I ever say "could care less" there's an IMPLIED "but not much less" tacked on there.... (I am reminded, completely non apropos, of "Ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put." Can you name the (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
| (...) c /effect/affect/ or c /How does it effect/What effect does it have on/ GRIN But anyway, great question. I think it should have a strong negative effect, or that is, it should affect the score negatively. GRIN again. I don't know if it should (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
