Subject:
|
Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.appraisal
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:45:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2740 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.appraisal, Richard Marchetti writes:
> Hey Y'all:
>
> I have created a printer friendly, html version of my proposed construction
> toy grading standards and it is now live online at:
>
> http://members.aol.com/blueofnoon3/lego/grading.html
>
> I hope that it will prove useful in providing an easier method of appraising
> and communicating the condition of complete sets and single elements.
>
> Let me know if you find a typo or have some other constructive feedback.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hop-Frog
A great effort Richard, but I'm still no clearer on the difference between
MISB! and MISB!!!!? :)
A general point, I think the scoring from 1-100 is a little ambitious. What
is the deference between a 56 box and a 57? I think 0-10 would be better.
Rough and ready types (me) could rate the box 5.5, whilst aficionados could
rate it 5.7 or even 5.6752481. Using 1-100 will deliver scores in multiples
of 5 (5,10,15… 95, 100 ).
Just my view.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
| Hey Y'all: I have created a printer friendly, html version of my proposed construction toy grading standards and it is now live online at: (URL) hope that it will prove useful in providing an easier method of appraising and communicating the (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.appraisal, lugnet.announce) !
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
