Subject:
|
Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.appraisal
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 13:57:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2615 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.appraisal, David Arnon writes:
> What about cigarette smoke?
> How does it effect the score?
c /effect/affect/
or
c /How does it effect/What effect does it have on/
GRIN
But anyway, great question. I think it should have a strong negative effect,
or that is, it should affect the score negatively. GRIN again.
I don't know if it should just be a downgrade or a separately scored thing,
but I lean toward separately scored. I just don't want it. Other people
(heavy smokers) could care less and should be comfortable with pristine but
smoky stuff (instead of shying away because the score suggests it's less
than pristine, which is what would happen if it was just a downcheck)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
| (...) Well, with all of that in mind and because it is an obviously good point, I added a "Notes" section to my sample item description and a special note following the section on the relationship between tobacco smoke defects and resale value. I (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
Message is in Reply To:
23 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
