| |
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Stylistically it is neat. And it's a cool design exercise. However it
> pretty clearly violates trade dress IMHO.
Yeah, well that was definitely the idea BUT perhaps TLG would choose to
ignore. Would prolly have to contact their sharks first...
> So I vote for a variant on the first one. Perhaps putting studs on some
> faces of the bricks the way LUGNET did?
Well, then I think we are infringing on Todd's property. I purposely
*didn't* put studs on it, but I guess that makes it a little too "corporate"
(I've been in the corporate logo design mode lately) I'm kind of laughing
to myself because I put out two completely opposite ideas and of course
folks are almost divided evenly:-p Way to promote group cohesiveness,
John;-) I'll go back to the proverbial drawing board. One question. Do
folks want something official looking in general, or fun looking? [1]
-John
[1] I can hear the answer already... "yes";-)
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Greater Midwest Lego Users Group
|
| I'd like it to be officially fun looking, or, if you'd rather, offical looking in a fun way. Hope that helps. MN only: (ignore if not MN) So is the meeting next week Wed or Thu? Heck I may just come over both nites, who knows. (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.loc.us.wi, lugnet.loc.us.mn, lugnet.loc.us.il, lugnet.loc.us.oh, lugnet.loc.us.ia, lugnet.loc.us.mi, lugnet.loc.us.in)
|
Message is in Reply To:
47 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
