To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.auOpen lugnet.loc.au in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / Australia / 9138
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
"Kerry Raymond" <kerry@dstc.edu.au> wrote in message news:GynwDJ.2sG@lugnet.com... (...) Well, I'm sure I'd come across as blunt and argumentative if I got into the habit of posting more... when I post a lot I tend to end up that way! :-) -- Cheers, (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Curator for .loc.au
 
I am now curator for .loc.au. I've updated the links on the .loc.au page, to give a link to the existing BrickHeads Bulletin .loc.au groups page, along with some more up to date trading and purchasing links. Does anyone have a suitable image of a (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) Cool. Looks good. (...) You could ask whether the Lugnet one is feely available for use as seen here (URL)Let me know if anyone has any suggestions for what goes on the .loc.au page... Well, you could link to my MUGs page (URL) but I'm not (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) Isn't this where you wring your hands, laugh evilly, and announce your imminent plot for world domination? :) I mean, I've never actually been in control of anything more important than a small turtle [1], but it seems reasonable. best LFB [1] (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) Shhhh!!!!! You'll give my plan away. Not that I have a plan or anything like that, obviously. Actually, I note may have given it away earlier (see (URL) I mean, I've never (...) Everyone has to start somewhere! Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) Excellent. Good news all round. Thanks for stepping up for this. (...) Interesting idea. I haven't seen one - it would presumeably need to be pretty big given the detail and diagonals. Maybe the Eureka flag would be a better idea. That could (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
In lugnet.loc.au, Richie Dulin writes: Hi Richie :) I'm at work so I'll make it quick... Thie ozbricks link has an '.au' after it - ozbricks is just www.ozbricks.com rather than (URL) :) Mel www.brickzine.com P.S I have a 'Lego' Aussie flag, just no (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) I started to build one, mosaic style, for an assignment when I was in fifth grade. I recall it became somewhat tedious, and my supply of blue 1xn's was getting close to exhausted (I didn't have as much LEGO in those days, and blue didn't annoy (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) Maybe grab the "Words that best describe me" from the member page 8?) ROSCO (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) Also added the BrickZone link. (...) Excellent! Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) Actually a lot more than you might think when you add us all up. What would I put ... hmm ... Kerry Raymond, last seen crossing over to the dark side :-) (...) I demand a shrubbery! Kerry (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) Wonderful! mine will say ... Kerry Raymond, talkative Still, probably an accurate description. Kerry (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) Indeed! Without going to the pages, do you know who would be: "Blunt. Argumentative. Reasonable", "amusing in small doses", "Weird" or "Mostly harmless"? Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) 49 LUGNET members (my description is obsessive), and a few others. Not sure of regular posters though... we'll have to wait for the next noisemakers survey. Or engage in some tedious post counting - wait, I'm obsessive, I'll get on to it (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) No idea, but it's frightening to think I might share a newsgroup with such people :-) Kerry (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) While on the subject of four word descriptions can mine be 'head down bricks up' Just trying to get in early Peter C (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) Oh, I don't know - "mostly harmless" doesn't sound *too* scary 8?) ROSCO (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) WELL...It doesn't say being weird is a personal evaluation :) Benjamin Whytcross (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) Jeepers Creepers, don't even THINK of putting ME under the 'weird' banner ;) more like, as I say at work... "not just a silly face" :P Mel (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) In June, there were 38 posters to .loc.au 8 of them were foreigners (or at least seemed to me to be). Of the 30 Australians who posted (and that is more than I thought),5 made more than 10 posts, 5 made between 6 and 10 posts. Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) What an umm.... interesting fact :P. I guess I was one of the twenty who posted less than 5 times. -stephen hurn (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) OK, Mr Accountant, give us the full stats! Inquiring minds want to know! Kerry (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) I'm glad you asked! 38 posters with an average of 4.8 posts each (with a standard deviation of 6.2). Those posters who were above average (in terms of number of posts) were: 24.. Mel Brown 23.. Richie Dulin 19.. Kerry Raymond AND Ross Crawford (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
Did you actually bother to hand count these post or did you use some form of script to do it? (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) OK, I'll revise my description to Kerry Raymond, less talkative than Mel Kerry (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) HA! nice try grrly ;) I'm not *that* talkative :P ummm... I don't think so anyway... am I? me? nahhhh can't be... impossible... oh and what are we here for anyway? LEGO wasn't it? oh yeah, that's right... LEGO... now where was I... Mel (who is (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) I started it by hand, then I noticed I could get 100 posts on a page (compact format) and cut and paste them into a spreadsheet... Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au)
 
(...) Minor correction & some new information There were only 37 posters ... average 4.9 posts, standard deviation of 6.3 I'd missed a duplicate... :-( Interestingly, the split was: 15.. Australian LUGNET members 14.. Australian non-LUGNET members (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au)
 
(...) I for one had no idea how much I didn't know! I find it rather interesting (and ain't that just what you'd expect from a CA?) Richard Still baldly going... (...) Quite possibly. The International High Conclave of the Brotherhood of (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au)
 
(...) No, no, absolutely not! Here's some more good stuff: 30.6% of Australian LUGNET members posted to .loc.au in June BUT only 0.0000007% of Australian non-LUGNET members posted to .loc.au in June AND only 0.0000000013% of the rest of the world (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au)
 
(...) It takes them years to do anything! They've been processing my membership application for *ages*. I'm having to make do with the curatorship of .loc.au in the meantime. (...) Well, that shouldn't be a problem. They manage to process 97.3% of (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au)
 
(...) But what's the approval rate of such applications??? ROSCO (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au)
 
(...) 102%, but I suspect there may be a statistical error (of at least +/-2%) involved in that calculation. Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au)
 
(...) Well, I knew I was doing more than my fair share. C'mon you other 70% slackers! Do your share of the postings for a change! :-) Kerry (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au)
 
(...) Hey! Two years ago I used to post more than anyone!!! Then I suddenly realised that I was spending too much time posting and not enough time building... ;-) And anyways, whenever I finds sumthin' out and goes to announce it here, I sees that (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Curator for .loc.au
 
(...) Funny, I thought a lot more foreigners posted in .loc.au? Mark "ofcourse Australians *are* foreigners to me" de Kock (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR