Australia : 13563


Local / Australia / 13563	13562 \| 13564

Subject:	Re: NR-75 - The Ghan (The way it should have been done ;-) )
Newsgroups:	lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au
Date:	Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:31:16 GMT
Viewed:	273 times

> I'm pretty happy with the overall design; Tim says it's not as high as it > should be, but I figured figs are short to begin with so that was okay. LMK > what you all think. > > Legoswami Nice work Swami and better late than never :P. I don't know what happened to the logo but something went wrong... As for minifigs, everyone knows they are tall and broad, not short. That's why trains should be six-wide. Sheesh!!! Tim

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: NR-75 - The Ghan (The way it should have been done ;-) )
(...) If you said 6-wide represents an 8ft wide coach body, a minifig is 41mm / 48mm x 8ft = 6'10" tall and 16mm / 48mm x 8ft = 2'8" wide at the waist (standard minifig with hair but no rucksack). If 6-wide represents a 10ft wide body for American (...) (19 years ago, 16-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)

Message is in Reply To:

		NR-75 - The Ghan (The way it should have been done ;-) )
As most of you know, it was my end of the 24 Hour Build Challenge deal to build a Ghan in 8 wide. So here it is: (URL) Gallery after mod: (URL) (Ignore the Playboy bunny on the side. It's a trick of the light and Tim R0x0r for teh renderz.) I'm (...) (19 years ago, 15-Oct-05, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au, FTX) !

25 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search