|
 | | Re: In the shadow of bent trees
|
| I ordered two sets. They were also bent. I'll be pretty surprised if any "de-bending" solutions have long-lasting effects. (I welcome the oppurtunity to be surprised.) It's ridiculous that I should be faced with such a task anyway. I am *extremely* (...) (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|  
sets
(score: 0.860)
|
|
| | Some Sculptures missing from Shop@Home ?
|
| Hello Lego Direct, I was just looking around on shop.lego.com (for the US) and noticed that the Dragon and the Statue of Liberty are no longer listed on the sculptures page. There may be other sets missing also. There are currently only 4 sets (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.860)
|
|
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
| (...) If that's their concern, then it's too late. MegaBloks ProBuilder sets 9760 for $20 and 9780 for $50 include about 150 and 600 grey 2x4 bricks respectively, as well as a number of 1xN grey bricks, tons of grey plates, and a lot more, and (...) (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.860)
|
|
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
| Allan Bedford wrote in message ... (...) reply (...) were (...) The surveys are still appearing in sets, I have had some within the last few months. Don't remember which set(s) they were in. Over the last 3 years I have sent in several and handed (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.860)
|
|
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
| (...) But it's also completely understandable if they don't want to say something like "Um well, the sets that were slated to have lots of sand red weren't doing well on the market and the next ones coming down the pike did poorly in market analysis (...) (23 years ago, 9-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.860)
|
|
| | Re: www.LEGO.com/trains updated!
|
| David Graham <david@graham167.fre...rve.co.uk> wrote in message news:GorAyv.2uL@lugnet.com... (...) NOTE: prototype sets do not nessecary come out... What I really would like to see is the Re460 (SBB460) (...) like Question: Why do children like (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.trains)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.860)
|
|
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON Light Gray?
|
| (...) Well, at least we are talking about this! And that’s what I wanted. I really hope if we keep talking about this subject of light gray bricks, we just might see them next year? Was I harsh......Maybe, but I don’t really feel so. Brad is a CEO (...) (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.860)
|
|
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
| (...) At least we had fun, if not very scientific fun, and Brad had fun along with us it seems, along the way to seeing Cypress Trees and the like. Speaking of which maybe I should sneak-order some before my supposed "last Lego set ever (10000)" on (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.859)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.859)
|
|
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
| My apologies if this message ends up getting posted twice. I really wrote this several hours ago via my newsreader, used the message confirmation via email, but the server hasn't posted it yet. "Richie Dulin" <rdulin@mailandnews.com> wrote in (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.859)
|
|
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
| "Erik Olson" <erik@olson.pair.com> wrote in message news:Go5rFr.9u6@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) it (...) They (...) I (...) testing (...) which (...) It has been a while and I don't recall which set it came in but I found a small survey (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.859)
|
|
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
| "Allan Bedford" <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@...vista.net> wrote in message news:Go5tMG.GAF@lugnet.com... (...) either, (...) LUGNET, (...) I think you are missing Richies point Allen. Even if lego.com gets 1000 times more hits than lugnet.com does, it (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.859)
|
|
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
| (...) I would be willing to bet a shiny new red 2x4 brick that the LEGO site gets more hits during any given time period than LUGNET. I'm simply saying that LUGNET does not represent the general public, only a small niche of fans. (...) No, I have (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.859)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.859)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.859)
|
|
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
| (...) No, I think Richie and I guess you, are missing *my* point. I'm only trying to point out that LEGO uses LUGNET as it's internet information distribution point to the exclusion of its own website. Things are announced on LUGNET that do not get (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.859)
|
|
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON Light Gray?
|
| (...) I guess we (Lego Community as a whole) need to either: a) boycott Lego or b) everybody flood Brad, and others at Lego Direct (spam their personal mail accounts) with our opinions until they either forward them to the right channels or decide (...) (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.859)
|
|
| | Re: announcing the "My Own Creation" series
|
| (...) This is the best anouncement I have seen from LD. This will make everyone happy (even the lunatic fringe that didn't want re-issued sets.) I will definately be ordering two of those after Christmas. (And I am mostly a space builder!) (...) (...) (23 years ago, 15-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.859)
|
|
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON Light Gray?
|
| (...) Mike, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I feel it's only fair to state this: If the LEGO company as a whole doesn't soon pull up its socks, there won't be any LEGO Direct, there won't be any bulk parts and there won't be any more (...) (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.859)
|
|
| | Not available
|
| Dear Brad, after all the glowing reviews of the new MOC-series, and the rumour of more classics being available in 'Hard to find' @shop.lego.com I thought I'd have a look myself. Now the sets look pretty good (even though they're not Model Team or (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.859)
|
