LEGO Direct : Search Results: wheel sets


LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / Search Results: wheel sets

Results 581 – 600 of about 1400.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
(...) If that's their concern, then it's too late. MegaBloks ProBuilder sets 9760 for $20 and 9780 for $50 include about 150 and 600 grey 2x4 bricks respectively, as well as a number of 1xN grey bricks, tons of grey plates, and a lot more, and (...) (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.248)

		Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
(...) At least we had fun, if not very scientific fun, and Brad had fun along with us it seems, along the way to seeing Cypress Trees and the like. Speaking of which maybe I should sneak-order some before my supposed "last Lego set ever (10000)" on (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.248)

		Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
"Allan Bedford" <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@...vista.net> wrote in message news:Go5tMG.GAF@lugnet.com... (...) either, (...) LUGNET, (...) I think you are missing Richies point Allen. Even if lego.com gets 1000 times more hits than lugnet.com does, it (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.248)

		Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
My apologies if this message ends up getting posted twice. I really wrote this several hours ago via my newsreader, used the message confirmation via email, but the server hasn't posted it yet. "Richie Dulin" <rdulin@mailandnews.com> wrote in (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.248)

		Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
"Erik Olson" <erik@olson.pair.com> wrote in message news:Go5rFr.9u6@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) it (...) They (...) I (...) testing (...) which (...) It has been a while and I don't recall which set it came in but I found a small survey (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.248)

		Re: WHY SO LONG ON Light Gray?
(...) Well, at least we are talking about this! And that’s what I wanted. I really hope if we keep talking about this subject of light gray bricks, we just might see them next year? Was I harsh......Maybe, but I don’t really feel so. Brad is a CEO (...) (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.248)

		Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
(...) I would be willing to bet a shiny new red 2x4 brick that the LEGO site gets more hits during any given time period than LUGNET. I'm simply saying that LUGNET does not represent the general public, only a small niche of fans. (...) No, I have (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.248)

		Is LEGO listening to it's customers? (was Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!)
(...) [snip] (...) My point is: That people visiting LEGO.com represent a very small portion of LEGOs customers. You've complained that informal polls on LUGNET do not represent the views of the general public. I've said that polls on LEGO.com would (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.248)

		Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
(...) No, I think Richie and I guess you, are missing my point. I'm only trying to point out that LEGO uses LUGNET as it's internet information distribution point to the exclusion of its own website. Things are announced on LUGNET that do not get (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.248)

		Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
(...) But it's also completely understandable if they don't want to say something like "Um well, the sets that were slated to have lots of sand red weren't doing well on the market and the next ones coming down the pike did poorly in market analysis (...) (23 years ago, 9-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.248)

		Re: we want....a shrubbery! one that looks nice... and not too expensive
(...) I always liked the Cypress Trees, but in my youth never devoted the money to the bulk pack that supplied one -since it was only one tree, and I was a child with no job. I think now is the time to pick up a few. Great offer! "Bushes"? Do you (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.246)

		Re: we want....a shrubbery! one that looks nice... and not too expensive
(...) Why not apply the same policy to all the sets the company releases. ;) (...) This sounds good. I guess my first question (and it's asked in all seriousness) is... "Why just these?" Is there some rhyme or reason to releasing just this small (...) (23 years ago, 17-Nov-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.246)

		Re: we want....a shrubbery! one that looks nice... and not too expensive
Brad Justus wrote in message ... (...) Yes! Excellent! You can never have enough trees, and those 1x2 plates with 1 stud are addictive, no matter how many you use, it just makes you want to use more. Is there hope for the traditional tiny flowers? (...) (23 years ago, 17-Nov-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.246)

		Re: we want....a shrubbery! one that looks nice... and not too expensive
(...) AHHHHH! You have said the word which we cannot bear to hear! Good news always travel fast! You have finally unleashed the best bit of Lego Brick greenery from the realm of the "super-rare/MIA"... Speaking as one of the most unfortunate (...) (23 years ago, 17-Nov-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.246)

		Re: Goodbye Lego and thanks for all the bricks
(...) Darn! lol :) <snip> (...) Profits? They are trying to charge MORE for LESS take for example the blue tub, $20 for 1200 bricks (the 3033) well, its gone - what replaced it? Another blue tub with just over 600 parts (parts, not bricks) for the (...) (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.246)

		Re: Goodbye Lego and thanks for all the bricks
(...) Relax... they'll come up with a replacement for the 3033 blue tub. Offering sets consisting of only bricks is not a one-time thing, you know. Recall 950 piece buckets 1819 and 1776. Granted, the list price was $20 and a tub beats the heck out (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.246)

		Re: Goodbye Lego and thanks for all the bricks
(...) Indeed. They did it before. Ever see the figures available during the mid 1970's? They had Town sets, but no mini-fig as we think of it. And during the 80's, it wasn't called System with a logo. The boxes just had the word LEGOLAND stamped on (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.246)

		Re: Goodbye Lego and thanks for all the bricks
(...) Yes Adidas has been part of the soccer sets from the begining. Derek (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.245)

		Re: Goodbye Lego and thanks for all the bricks
(...) Hi, I was at the Lego Event 2001 in Holland, and some people where complaining (as i do too) abouth the sets. Too many large bricks (juniorisation), no houses as in the 80-ties, and getting too expensive for what you get. Santa Claus is (...) (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.245)

		Re: Goodbye Lego and thanks for all the bricks
(...) "System" to me is more about an interconnected play world, with original, open themes, than it is about the particular form of the figures. Playmobil has its own "system," for example. Lego could conceivably develop a new one based on a (...) (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.245)

More: Next Page >>