 | | Re: "Chrome" sets 4816-19
|
|
(...) What was the point of your post, Richard? To make fun of Tim because he didn't know that TLC wouldn't respond in a timely manner? Or to take the opportunity to take another shot at Brad? Didn't your mother ever tell you that if you don't have (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
(...) I went there, but apparently more pocket change is needed: There was an internal error on the server in processing this request. -Tom McD. when replying, most restaurant servers have internal errors processing spamcake requests. (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: "Chrome" sets 4816-19
|
|
(...) You mean Brad didn't just fire back a quick and timely response to your query? Gee, will wonders never cease...and you were polite and everything too! What was the point of your being on Lugnet again, Brad? -- Richard (24 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Studios does NOT run on Win2000 (was: movie maker in stock)
|
|
(...) Well, I just got off the phone with tech support. The LEGO Studios SW/Camera does not work under Windows 2000. Only on Win98 (second edition) and the new Windows Millennium. The S@H catalog is lying when it says it will run on Win2000 (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Website has problems, too TIME consuming for mom's, Catalog beef!!!
|
|
(...) <snipped> because I don't even have time to bother with the website after all the problems I've been hearing about (...) I'm glad you wrote this message. I would find it hard to believe that LEGO doesn't realize that MOMS are the primary (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Website has problems, too TIME consuming for mom's, Catalog beef!!!
|
|
Catalog Beef After several tries we are STILL waiting for a Fall Lego catalog! I would think with the amount of money our household spends at S@H we would at least get a catalog sent to us. The last time I called S@H, the gal stated that I would (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
(...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
If they don't offer, ask them to reimburse you for your expenses plus a little extra for your time. Take it in LEGO sets if they'd prefer it to cash. (...) and (...) database (...) domains, (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Are the new Duplo trains a sign?
|
|
(...) It is speculation at this point based upon info from this post: (URL) , and from the observation that minimal effort is being put into the 9 volt line. It appears to me at least that the 9 volt line has been riding the coattails of sets (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Are the new Duplo trains a sign?
|
|
John Neal wrote in message <39D6E68E.DFB8BEE8@u...st.net>... (...) hope--that (...) line (...) enthusiasts (...) exceed (...) something (...) How do we know that they are abandoning the 9V line? What do you think is the possibility that they will (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
(...) Yeah, the funny part is that I bought the legotechnic.com, legotechnic.org, and legotechnic.net domain names about two months ago (check out the WHOIS database and you'll see it's pointed at my DNS servers, just like my macgenius.com domain (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
(...) Having had my attention called to this page, notice that the first version of the Rock Raiders dump truck bin appears to possibly be DUPLO! FUT: lugnet.underground Frank (24 years ago, 1-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.underground)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
(...) I didn't say it was suprising. (...) At the time, that -was- superior technology. (...) I'm aware of that too. I'm a graphic designer and I use a Mac at work as well as at home. (...) I'm not talking about "outside of the USA." Since the (...) (24 years ago, 1-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
(...) All your analysis shows is the small minority of publishers who lay out books like this still use macs, where as the average member of the public (i.e. Lego customers) use PCs. It should not surprise you that the boxes, manuals, adverts and (...) (24 years ago, 1-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Are the new Duplo trains a sign?
|
|
(...) That would be great and that is my hope as well. My fear is that the mediocrity of recent 9 volt set designs reflects just the opposite. I see no vision, no master plan, no desire other than to put out junk. But even the *junkiest* set would (...) (24 years ago, 1-Oct-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it YET AGAIN...
|
|
(...) Another Bug: If you're a User of a german windows version, the browser jumps to (URL) the OK Button, and..... (URL) a Loop forever ??? Cookies are turned on and Flash is installed (I can see the spinning Brick) Werner P.S. Every new Flashpage (...) (24 years ago, 30-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Macs Rule, PCs drool! (was Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...)
|
|
Thanks for those astute observations, Mark! We Mac users know that Macs are superior, but it's nice to rub it in once in a while:-) FUT.fun -John (...) (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Lego blew it YET AGAIN...
|
|
Go to (URL) Web Extra Choose "Build the Street Sensation" Choose "Download building instructions tool to your computer" Download the offline building tool (takes forever even on a T1). Install it. Run it. Problem 1 - it requires Shockwave 7.03r1 - (...) (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
(...) <snip> Please open the pages of your Ultimate Lego Book: pp26, 27 - Lego Chess and Rock Raiders appear in Mac windows (these are Photoshop documents, however, check out the zoom size and the file size in the corner) pp28 - Another Photoshop (...) (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up (and ALREADY a mistake)
|
|
(...) I don't know when this was corrected, but it is a two by six today, and I don't think anyone mentioned it previously. BEN (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
