 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) snip (...) Dave, Your comments here are well taken, and I agree with them. While I have disagreed about some decisions from TLC, I make my position known with what I choose to buy. I bought the Maersk ship for me (and another as a gift) to (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) I've stayed out of this stupid, drawn-out thread so far. But, Dave, I do appreciate your efforts at holding the fort. Let it be known that I agree with what Dave says above. TLC, there are some people in the community who *do* appreciate your (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) You're comparing this situation to wedding vows? Ok that's just ridiculous. (...) <snip> (...) Dave K, if you're still reading this, it's clear that Ken here really believes that LEGO has/had made some sort of special "promise" with him - (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) rtlToronto has beed doing hobby shows for the past few years, and the Meccano guys are there displaying their creations. If anyone ever wants to see what happens when the company providing their 'work material' for their chosen hobby (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego) !!
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) And I would agree with that assessment wholeheartedly, John. That said, if you said, "I can only produce 200 of these printed shirts because I only have 200 shirts of this colour, and I don't have the opportunity to get more shirts of this (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) And that, right there, probably best sums up why you are meeting with so much disagreement. You believe that without TLC, your hobby ends, despite the collection of LEGO I assume you must already have, and despite a very extensive after-market (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) You know what, at this point if I was head of marketting at TLC I would pull the new run from S@H and only supply them to Maersk. That'd make money for the company AND save their integrity (1). ROSCO (1) As percieved by a small number of AFOLs (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Scott Lyttle wrote: <snip> (...) I would only ever make as many shirts as a customer would want:-) (...) Well, at this point, I, as the producer for the group would be totally out of the loop. (...) I'm not sure a situation involving (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) Ha! Clearly you haven't been reading all my posts. I think I get the most annoyed with people who leap to conclusions about things they shouldn't. They said that ONE phrase that was incorrect, and you and others jump down Lego's throat. They (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Missed opportunities (was: A Community Problem)
|
|
(...) Wow Larry, you missed a perfect opportunity for a footnote! (...) And a sub-footnote opportunity missed no less! That's not like you at all! Wink. ROSCO (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) <roll eyes> How about "Well dear I did say no more buying Lego this month, but you see they have 30% off this week..." Seriously, vows? (...) Well Dave it looks like you can end this. I must say your display of patient is just as impressive as (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) It may be a moral question, but more importantly it's a "have you stopped beating your wife?" question too. I tend not to go around claiming I'm a man of my word. Why would I need to? If I have to make a big deal about it, maybe I'm not. So (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) Crying is very unbecomming.... (...) Can I use this defense on my wedding vows? "Honest dear I meant what I was saying at the time but circumstances changed...." SNIP (...) The facts are that Lego Promised this to be a limited run. A new (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) And on the other side of the coin many want to defend the company no matter what they do. This is not bley or click hinges. This is basic morality.I'm with the "nay-sayers" because the company is on a destructive path and if they go down so (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) I didn't impugn anything. I asked a simple question wich is quite relevant given that this is at it's essence a moral question.-Ken (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) And by "Selective Interpretation" you mean anything short of the way you see it?-Ken (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
snippage (...) Dave, If you don't get a LEGO set for Christmas, e-mail me. I'll send you one for Christmas. No charge for set or shipping. Consider it a gift for all your efforts. Hell...send me your address..I'll send you something regardless of (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) LOL!! Thanx, Dave, that's my laugh for the week! :] KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203 (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) John, You're a business owner, we all know you do much of the shirts for the clubs and Brickfest. Let me pose a question. What if you made a "special edition" Lego-based T-shirt for some club or big event. Say the group wanting the shirts told (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene!
|
|
snippage (...) more snippage (...) John, I hate to be nitpicky here (oh, wait, half the posts on this thread are about being nitpicky), but I thought the color of set 10052 was yellow.. (URL) a different story... Scott (22 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|