| |
In lugnet.lego, Dave Schuler wrote:
> In lugnet.lego, Ken Nagel wrote:
> > In lugnet.lego, David Koudys wrote:
> >
> > > > > > SNIP
> > > > > Which part in there was lieing?
> > > > >
> > > > > Just becasue you didn't like what happened, does not give you 'carte blanc'
> > > > > to interpret the events the way you wish.
> >
> > I don't need anything to be interpreted. Anyone who knows me knows I am a man of
> > my word. How about you?
>
> Hey now, there's no need for that. Dave K can speak for himself, but what the
> heck--I can speak for himself, too. Regardless of his national origins, I have
> always found Dave K to be honest and forthright. He is willing to admit when he
> is wrong, and he doesn't tout himself when he's right.
>
> You may disagree with his interpretation of these events, but it's hardly
> necessary to impugn his integrity along the way.
>
> Dave!
I didn't impugn anything. I asked a simple question wich is quite relevant given
that this is at it's essence a moral question.-Ken
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
