Subject:
|
Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Dec 2004 01:40:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
11088 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, David Eaton wrote:
| |
In lugnet.lego, Ken Nagel wrote:
| |
In lugnet.lego, David Eaton wrote:
SNIP
|
But to be even more honest, I think the Lego nay-sayers are mostly just
itching for an excuse to vent at the company. If they hadn’t done the color
change, were still producing classic space sets, weren’t as juniorized, had a
mix of studded and studless beamed technic sets, I seriously doubt they’d be
getting this kind of ridiculous flak over such a pathetic thing that probably
could’ve been fixed by inserting a single trivial word into their set
description.
DaveE
|
And on the other side of the coin many want to defend the company no matter what
they do. This is not bley or click hinges. This is basic morality.I’m with the
“nay-sayers” because the company is on a destructive path and if they go down so
does the hobby I love. If you’ve paid any attention to the financal news you
know which direction the company is headed.-Ken
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) Ha! Clearly you haven't been reading all my posts. I think I get the most annoyed with people who leap to conclusions about things they shouldn't. They said that ONE phrase that was incorrect, and you and others jump down Lego's throat. They (...) (19 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) And that, right there, probably best sums up why you are meeting with so much disagreement. You believe that without TLC, your hobby ends, despite the collection of LEGO I assume you must already have, and despite a very extensive after-market (...) (19 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) I stand corrected! I skimmed right over that bit in Jake's post ((URL) repeatedly because I figured it was the S@H description. (...) The first quote I'll give you. That one by no means. It was true, still is true. No promises on possible (...) (19 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
