Subject:
|
Re: Defining the "term" BI
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:51:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5969 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.inst, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> Reposting not FTX'd
> -Orion
I thought that ftx was optional. Why did you repost it as ftx?
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Defining the "term" BI
|
| (...) No, you posted it as FTX, I posted it plain text. The defualt for a given post is based on whether or not the parent message was FTX or not. In this case the parent post was FTX and you forgot to switch back to plain text causing your table to (...) (21 years ago, 14-Sep-03, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Defining the "term" BI
|
| Reposting not FTX'd -Orion There are many terminologies that would be nice to lock down and they releate to levels of hierarchy of the images (and text) that make up the instructions: Graphical Building Instructions Front Cover Completly assembled (...) (21 years ago, 14-Sep-03, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
