Subject:
|
Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:34:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
19788 times
|
| |
|
|
--snip--
| |
I should disclaim that I don’t feel very strongly about this, and it’s more
of a light diversion for me than a serious argument. I’m much more concerned
with the knuckleheads who refer to “Megablox” instead of the proper term
Mega Bloks.
|
Oh I’m not taking it seriously at all ;) But I will fight for the linguistic
differences between us and them (defined as the situation calls for).
I have never heard, outside of TV and my recent trip to the US, the bricks
referred to as anything other than ‘LEGO’. And I’ve lived in both Australia and
England. A kid refers to a LEGO set, or collectively to his LEGO. As a child I
would visit my friend’s house to “play LEGO”. We do, however, naturally
pluralise with an ‘s’.
So... how about this: Of the English-speaking population that might reasonably
be anticipated to pluralize a word by adding an S on the end of it, nearly 70%
of non-AFOLs use the term “LEGOs.”
Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
34 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
