To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 55811
55810  |  55812
Subject: 
Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:09:17 GMT
Viewed: 
20515 times
  
In lugnet.general, Don Rogerson wrote:

   This is why it is ridiculous for him to make a logical leap from this data to a claim about usefulness.

If the author is worried about maximum variation with minimal parts... go play with Silly-Putty. LEGO is not, at the heart, about combinatorics, it’s about creations.

Perhaps he should do more building and less math. Or, visit a convention where people who are actually creating are displaying.

Logically correct... and totally worthless.

-- Brian Davis



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
 
(...) I think it's the higher ratio of piece types to set size that leads him to conclude the sets are not as useful for free-form building as they once were. The argument he makes is that if you have a set of 100 unique pieces, it has less (...) (13 years ago, 1-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)

34 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR