Subject:
|
Re: Lego Purity
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:19:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4483 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, David Eaton wrote:
| |
In lugnet.general, Tim David wrote:
| |
Hmmm, I know I’m not Mr Pure, but I’m not sure why I scored quite so
low!
|
Alright, I sneakily changed how it calculates things behind-the-scenes, so...
you’re still low, but not *AS* low.
|
Are you sure the Pure/Impure headings above the scores are the right way round?
According to them, I score 10/10 :D
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lego Purity
|
| (...) Alright, I sneakily changed how it calculates things behind-the-scenes, so... you're still low, but not *AS* low. Basically, I was using a weighted average and a straightforward "distance from the mean" method for calculating scoring. I now (...) (17 years ago, 25-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
