Subject:
|
Re: Lego Purity
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:02:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4336 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, David Eaton wrote:
Congrats Dave, it’s really an interesting idea. I didn’t consider myself as pure
and rated myself at 3/10.
After answering I get :
“According to our data, on a purity scale from 0-10, you rate 0.17/10”
I don’t mind if it’s a good result or not, I just can’t help feeling very
satisfied. Am I so bad?
Thanks for the fun.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Lego Purity
|
| So, after being pointed at a (URL) thread on Classic-Space by Felix Greco>, I figured it might be interesting to see how the community feels about Lego purity in general. So, I made a little test: (URL) Right now, it's only got my own information, (...) (17 years ago, 25-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX) !!
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
